Role And Outcomes of Conservative Treatment in Management of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials

Andrew Arjun Sayampanathan, M. Tan, D. Lie
{"title":"Role And Outcomes of Conservative Treatment in Management of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials","authors":"Andrew Arjun Sayampanathan, M. Tan, D. Lie","doi":"10.13107/aja.2021.v06i01.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rotator cuff tears are known to result in significant societal burden. This review synthesises the evidence regarding the role and outcomes of conservatively managed rotator cuff tears. 17 prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (Level 1 and 2 studies) were included in this systematic review. Modalities which were studied were classified into physical rehabilitative modalities, electrophysiological rehabilitative modalities, biological therapies, and pharmacologic therapies. Outcomes which were evaluated in the included RCTs comprised of clinical outcomes, functional outcomes, pain scores, quality of life scores, imaging based outcomes, and patient satisfaction scores. As the modalities and outcomes studied were varied, no quantitative analysis could be performed based on the primary data available. Nevertheless, most studies do suggest that conservative treatment remains beneficial for the management of rotator cuff tears. Based on these findings, an algorithm which proposes conservative therapy as the central mode of management for rotator cuff tear patients has been described. More high-quality studies are required in this area of study to allow for a quantitative review (meta-analysis and meta-regression) of the various non-surgical treatment\nmodalities of rotator cuff tears.\nKeywords: Rotator Cuff Tears; Conservative; Non-operative; Management; Randomised controlled trials; Review.","PeriodicalId":331352,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Arthroscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Arthroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/aja.2021.v06i01.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rotator cuff tears are known to result in significant societal burden. This review synthesises the evidence regarding the role and outcomes of conservatively managed rotator cuff tears. 17 prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (Level 1 and 2 studies) were included in this systematic review. Modalities which were studied were classified into physical rehabilitative modalities, electrophysiological rehabilitative modalities, biological therapies, and pharmacologic therapies. Outcomes which were evaluated in the included RCTs comprised of clinical outcomes, functional outcomes, pain scores, quality of life scores, imaging based outcomes, and patient satisfaction scores. As the modalities and outcomes studied were varied, no quantitative analysis could be performed based on the primary data available. Nevertheless, most studies do suggest that conservative treatment remains beneficial for the management of rotator cuff tears. Based on these findings, an algorithm which proposes conservative therapy as the central mode of management for rotator cuff tear patients has been described. More high-quality studies are required in this area of study to allow for a quantitative review (meta-analysis and meta-regression) of the various non-surgical treatment modalities of rotator cuff tears. Keywords: Rotator Cuff Tears; Conservative; Non-operative; Management; Randomised controlled trials; Review.
保守治疗在肩袖撕裂治疗中的作用和结果:随机对照试验的系统回顾
众所周知,肩袖撕裂会造成严重的社会负担。这篇综述综合了关于保守治疗肩袖撕裂的作用和结果的证据。本系统综述纳入了17项前瞻性随机对照试验(rct)(1级和2级研究)。研究方式分为物理康复方式、电生理康复方式、生物治疗方式和药物治疗方式。纳入的随机对照试验评估的结果包括临床结果、功能结果、疼痛评分、生活质量评分、基于影像学的结果和患者满意度评分。由于研究的方式和结果各不相同,无法根据现有的原始数据进行定量分析。然而,大多数研究确实表明保守治疗对于肩袖撕裂的治疗仍然是有益的。基于这些发现,本文描述了一种算法,提出保守治疗作为肩袖撕裂患者管理的中心模式。这一研究领域需要更多高质量的研究,以便对肩袖撕裂的各种非手术治疗方式进行定量评价(荟萃分析和荟萃回归)。关键词:肩袖撕裂;保守的;不工作的;管理;随机对照试验;审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信