Comparison of three hand movement tracking sensors as cursor controllers

Gowdham Prabhakar, J. Rajesh, P. Biswas
{"title":"Comparison of three hand movement tracking sensors as cursor controllers","authors":"Gowdham Prabhakar, J. Rajesh, P. Biswas","doi":"10.1109/ICCICCT.2016.7987974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the era of modern computing, the means of interacting with the machine demands the user to feed the input commands through efficient ways. Since the time of introduction of Graphical User Interfaces (GUI), technologies to interact with the machine has been mostly confined to only one input device namely mouse. Even though there are several techniques for input modalities coming up in this area of research, the demand for the most comfortable way of UX design always persist in the realm of HCI. This paper evaluates three different input modalities namely Laser Point Tracker, IMU Tracker, Finger Tracker and Motion Tracker for the performance index, cognitive load and the system usability. The evaluation system uses an ISO Tasking method for pointing and selecting the targets on the display screen and the average selection time of the target is calculated using Fitts' Law.","PeriodicalId":315299,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Communication and Computational Technologies (ICCICCT)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Communication and Computational Technologies (ICCICCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCICCT.2016.7987974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the era of modern computing, the means of interacting with the machine demands the user to feed the input commands through efficient ways. Since the time of introduction of Graphical User Interfaces (GUI), technologies to interact with the machine has been mostly confined to only one input device namely mouse. Even though there are several techniques for input modalities coming up in this area of research, the demand for the most comfortable way of UX design always persist in the realm of HCI. This paper evaluates three different input modalities namely Laser Point Tracker, IMU Tracker, Finger Tracker and Motion Tracker for the performance index, cognitive load and the system usability. The evaluation system uses an ISO Tasking method for pointing and selecting the targets on the display screen and the average selection time of the target is calculated using Fitts' Law.
三种手部运动跟踪传感器作为光标控制器的比较
在现代计算时代,与机器交互的手段要求用户通过有效的方式输入命令。自从图形用户界面(GUI)出现以来,与机器交互的技术大多局限于一种输入设备,即鼠标。尽管在这个研究领域中出现了几种输入模式的技术,但在人机交互领域中,对最舒适的用户体验设计方式的需求始终存在。本文对激光点跟踪器、IMU跟踪器、手指跟踪器和运动跟踪器三种不同的输入方式的性能指标、认知负荷和系统可用性进行了评估。该评价系统采用ISO任务法对显示屏幕上的目标进行指向和选择,并利用菲茨定律计算目标的平均选择时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信