Directions for improving the quality of education in Belarusian universities (sociological analysis)

Yury Kalesnik, Vadzim Kleiman, V. Vasicheva
{"title":"Directions for improving the quality of education in Belarusian universities (sociological analysis)","authors":"Yury Kalesnik, Vadzim Kleiman, V. Vasicheva","doi":"10.2478/gssfj-2020-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Educational institutions all over the world realize the importance of promoting international cooperation. In order to stay competitive in such fields like education, research, innovations it is no longer enough to count on only internal resources. Exchange of experience, knowledge sharing, benchmarking provide possibilities for universities to constantly remain updated on modern know-hows. New opportunities for improving the quality of higher education in Belarus are provided by different international programs and projects. Among them there is the project of the EU Program ERASMUS + CBHE “University Teaching and Learning Enhancement” / UniTeLE, which has been implemented since 2019. The project coordinator is Linnaeus University (Sweden). In the framework of the ERASMUS + UniTeLE project, a consortium of Belarusian universities has conducted a higher education quality research. The purpose of this research is to identify areas for improving the quality of higher education in Belarus. The research was carried out on the basis of a sociological survey of a representative sampling of teachers, staff and students of six Belarusian universities (more than 350 respondents from Minsk, Gomel, Brest, Gorki, Polotsk, Grodno were interviewed). Both SWOT analysis of higher education quality in Belarus and focus group of possible improvement were performed. The discussion was attended by work groups of 25 leaders, teachers and students from each of the Belarusian universities of the project consortium. The following fundamental research results should be noted. Among the strengths of Belarusian universities are: specialization in the regions, the system of additional adult education, and practical experience of teachers (2/3 of respondents). 58% of respondents are confident in the advantages of innovative educational technologies used by teachers, 47% indicated a low intensity of innovation implementation. Respondents noted the high level of Hard Skills competencies of the teaching staff and insufficiently of Soft Skills competencies for both teachers and students. The respondents identified outdated educational technologies and methods and the content of curricula as the fundamental weakness of Belarusian education. The following areas of quality improvement have been identified as the most important for Belarusian universities: - the development of Soft Skills competencies of both teachers and students to provide their close interaction; - the development of Soft Skills competencies among students to provide their close interaction with employers (the development of job search skills, entrepreneurial activity); - the introduction of active teaching and learning methods, the development of interactive educational technologies; - the inсlusion of students in the process of education quality internal assessment; - systematic assessment of teachers, including the process of applying for a job, teacher academic development planning (HR management). For the practical improvement in the suggested areas, it is advisable to create Life Long Learning Centres and Centres of Academic Development of teachers in Belarusian universities, as well as a student-oriented quality assessment system. To improve the quality and competitiveness of Belarusian education, it is also advisable to develop international cooperation and networking among universities. The positive experience of such projects as TEMPUS ECOTESY, ERASMUS + UniTeLE, ERASMUS + BELL and others, can contribute to such cooperation and interaction.","PeriodicalId":210682,"journal":{"name":"Geopolitical, Social Security and Freedom Journal","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geopolitical, Social Security and Freedom Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/gssfj-2020-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Educational institutions all over the world realize the importance of promoting international cooperation. In order to stay competitive in such fields like education, research, innovations it is no longer enough to count on only internal resources. Exchange of experience, knowledge sharing, benchmarking provide possibilities for universities to constantly remain updated on modern know-hows. New opportunities for improving the quality of higher education in Belarus are provided by different international programs and projects. Among them there is the project of the EU Program ERASMUS + CBHE “University Teaching and Learning Enhancement” / UniTeLE, which has been implemented since 2019. The project coordinator is Linnaeus University (Sweden). In the framework of the ERASMUS + UniTeLE project, a consortium of Belarusian universities has conducted a higher education quality research. The purpose of this research is to identify areas for improving the quality of higher education in Belarus. The research was carried out on the basis of a sociological survey of a representative sampling of teachers, staff and students of six Belarusian universities (more than 350 respondents from Minsk, Gomel, Brest, Gorki, Polotsk, Grodno were interviewed). Both SWOT analysis of higher education quality in Belarus and focus group of possible improvement were performed. The discussion was attended by work groups of 25 leaders, teachers and students from each of the Belarusian universities of the project consortium. The following fundamental research results should be noted. Among the strengths of Belarusian universities are: specialization in the regions, the system of additional adult education, and practical experience of teachers (2/3 of respondents). 58% of respondents are confident in the advantages of innovative educational technologies used by teachers, 47% indicated a low intensity of innovation implementation. Respondents noted the high level of Hard Skills competencies of the teaching staff and insufficiently of Soft Skills competencies for both teachers and students. The respondents identified outdated educational technologies and methods and the content of curricula as the fundamental weakness of Belarusian education. The following areas of quality improvement have been identified as the most important for Belarusian universities: - the development of Soft Skills competencies of both teachers and students to provide their close interaction; - the development of Soft Skills competencies among students to provide their close interaction with employers (the development of job search skills, entrepreneurial activity); - the introduction of active teaching and learning methods, the development of interactive educational technologies; - the inсlusion of students in the process of education quality internal assessment; - systematic assessment of teachers, including the process of applying for a job, teacher academic development planning (HR management). For the practical improvement in the suggested areas, it is advisable to create Life Long Learning Centres and Centres of Academic Development of teachers in Belarusian universities, as well as a student-oriented quality assessment system. To improve the quality and competitiveness of Belarusian education, it is also advisable to develop international cooperation and networking among universities. The positive experience of such projects as TEMPUS ECOTESY, ERASMUS + UniTeLE, ERASMUS + BELL and others, can contribute to such cooperation and interaction.
提高白俄罗斯大学教育质量的方向(社会学分析)
世界各地的教育机构都意识到促进国际合作的重要性。为了在教育、研究、创新等领域保持竞争力,仅仅依靠内部资源是不够的。经验交流、知识共享和标杆管理为大学不断更新现代技术提供了可能。不同的国际计划和项目为提高白俄罗斯高等教育质量提供了新的机会。其中包括自2019年以来实施的欧盟ERASMUS + CBHE计划“大学教学促进”/ UniTeLE项目。项目协调人是瑞典林奈大学。在ERASMUS + UniTeLE项目的框架内,白俄罗斯大学联盟进行了高等教育质量研究。这项研究的目的是确定提高白俄罗斯高等教育质量的领域。这项研究是在对白俄罗斯六所大学的教师、教职员工和学生的代表性抽样进行社会学调查的基础上进行的(来自明斯克、戈梅利、布列斯特、戈尔基、波洛茨克、格罗德诺的350多名受访者接受了采访)。对白俄罗斯高等教育质量进行SWOT分析,并对可能的改进进行焦点小组分析。参加讨论的有来自项目联合体的每一所白俄罗斯大学的25名领导、教师和学生组成的工作组。值得注意的基础研究成果如下:白俄罗斯大学的优势包括:地区专业化、额外成人教育体系和教师的实践经验(占受访者的2/3)。58%的受访者对教师使用的创新教育技术的优势充满信心,47%的受访者表示创新实施的强度较低。受访者指出,教师的硬技能能力水平较高,而教师和学生的软技能能力不足。答复者指出,过时的教育技术和方法以及课程内容是白俄罗斯教育的根本弱点。质量改进的以下领域被确定为白俄罗斯大学最重要的领域:-教师和学生的软技能能力的发展,以提供他们的密切互动;-培养学生的软技能能力,以便他们与雇主密切互动(发展求职技能,创业活动);-引进积极主动的教学方法,发展互动式教育技术;——融入学生在教育质量过程中的内部评价;-对教师进行系统评估,包括求职流程、教师学术发展规划(人力资源管理)。为了切实改善所建议的领域,建议在白俄罗斯大学建立终身学习中心和教师学术发展中心,以及以学生为导向的质量评估系统。为了提高白俄罗斯教育的质量和竞争力,还应发展大学之间的国际合作和网络。temus ECOTESY、ERASMUS + UniTeLE、ERASMUS + BELL等项目的积极经验可以促进这种合作和互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信