Penerapan Model PBL berbasis Outdoor Study dalam Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis & Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa

N. Nurhasanah, Anna Fitri Hindriana, S. Sulistyono
{"title":"Penerapan Model PBL berbasis Outdoor Study dalam Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis & Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa","authors":"N. Nurhasanah, Anna Fitri Hindriana, S. Sulistyono","doi":"10.25134/edubiologica.v8i1.2980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the effect of the application of the PBL learning model to the improvement of critical thinking skills and the ability to argue students of SMA Negeri 1 Salem class X even semester� 2018/2019 on the concept of environmental pollution. The research method used is quasi-experimental. The study was conducted in two meetings. Learning activities are divided into two parts, namely learning activities outside the classroom (outdoor study) during the PBL 1-3 phase and learning in the classroom during the PBL 4-5 phase. The results showed� the application of the PBL model based on outdoor study was carried out well� there was an increase in the score of students' critical thinking skills at a pretest score of 18.9 to a posttest of 23.69� the ability of student argumentation in the average experimental class is at level 2, meaning that students already have the ability to submit claims or opinions built by students based on their knowledge and students are able to provide reasons or data to support the claim statement. Control class argumentation ability is at level 1� the positive response of students to learning PBL models based on outdoor studies is 89.4% with very strong criteria.","PeriodicalId":438412,"journal":{"name":"Edubiologica Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu dan Pendidikan Biologi","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edubiologica Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu dan Pendidikan Biologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25134/edubiologica.v8i1.2980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the application of the PBL learning model to the improvement of critical thinking skills and the ability to argue students of SMA Negeri 1 Salem class X even semester� 2018/2019 on the concept of environmental pollution. The research method used is quasi-experimental. The study was conducted in two meetings. Learning activities are divided into two parts, namely learning activities outside the classroom (outdoor study) during the PBL 1-3 phase and learning in the classroom during the PBL 4-5 phase. The results showed� the application of the PBL model based on outdoor study was carried out well� there was an increase in the score of students' critical thinking skills at a pretest score of 18.9 to a posttest of 23.69� the ability of student argumentation in the average experimental class is at level 2, meaning that students already have the ability to submit claims or opinions built by students based on their knowledge and students are able to provide reasons or data to support the claim statement. Control class argumentation ability is at level 1� the positive response of students to learning PBL models based on outdoor studies is 89.4% with very strong criteria.
基于户外实践的PBL模型,提高学生批判性思维能力和推理能力
本研究旨在确定PBL学习模式的应用对提高SMA Negeri 1 Salem X班学生在2018/2019学期对环境污染概念的批判性思维技能和辩论能力的影响。采用准实验研究方法。这项研究分两次进行。学习活动分为两部分,即PBL 1-3阶段的课堂外学习活动(户外学习)和PBL 4-5阶段的课堂内学习。结果表明:基于户外学习的PBL模式的应用得到了很好的实施;学生的批判性思维能力得分从前测的18.9分提高到后测的23.69分;学生的论证能力在实验班的平均水平为2级;这意味着学生已经有能力提交由学生根据他们的知识建立的索赔或意见,学生能够提供理由或数据来支持索赔声明。对照课的论证能力为1级——学生对学习基于户外研究的PBL模型的积极反应为89.4%,标准非常强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信