Mąż córki, wspólnik teściów czy zagrożenie dla rodziny? O roli zięcia w lwowskiej rodzinie mieszczańskiej na podstawie testamentów z lat 1541–1560

{"title":"Mąż córki, wspólnik teściów czy zagrożenie dla rodziny? O roli zięcia w lwowskiej rodzinie mieszczańskiej na podstawie testamentów z lat 1541–1560","authors":"","doi":"10.36693/202203p.435-460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A husband of the daughter, an associate of the in-laws or a threat to the family? On the role of the son-in-law in burgher families on the basis of testaments from 1541–1560\n\nIn the article the author examines questions relating to the position of sons-in-law in the early modern burgher families in Lviv. The conclusions of the article are based on sixteenth-century wills. As ego documents — personal documents — the wills contain information about private relations with the various relatives, serving as an irreplaceable source for research into the norms of family life. The problem of the relations between sons-in-law and the family of their spouses has not been previously tackled in the literature on the subject. Most authors have focused on analyses of the functioning of molecular families, leaving aside the relations between more distant relatives by blood or marriage. Yet sons-in-law are, apart from spouses and children, the family members most often encountered in last wills. The author’s analysis of the wills indicates that neither betrothal, nor marriage or payment of dowry put an end to contacts between the son-in-law and the in-laws. One the contrary, in burgher families sons-in-law often became associates in economic activities, representing the interests of not just their wives, but also their in-laws. At the same time, it seems significant that husbands of daughters were best captured in wills where there were no adult male descendants in the family, which enabled them, to some extent, to assume filial powers and privileges. At the same time, the son-in-law’s high position within the family may have made his father-in- law — the testator — who was in conflict with him fear for the future of both his widowed wife and his orphaned children. Thus the position of the daughters’ husbands was not strictly defined by custom, and their role as well as influence in their spouses’ families depended on various factors, including whether the family was part of urban society, whether there existed personal ties or other male relatives.","PeriodicalId":407009,"journal":{"name":"Solidarni z Ukrainą","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solidarni z Ukrainą","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36693/202203p.435-460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A husband of the daughter, an associate of the in-laws or a threat to the family? On the role of the son-in-law in burgher families on the basis of testaments from 1541–1560 In the article the author examines questions relating to the position of sons-in-law in the early modern burgher families in Lviv. The conclusions of the article are based on sixteenth-century wills. As ego documents — personal documents — the wills contain information about private relations with the various relatives, serving as an irreplaceable source for research into the norms of family life. The problem of the relations between sons-in-law and the family of their spouses has not been previously tackled in the literature on the subject. Most authors have focused on analyses of the functioning of molecular families, leaving aside the relations between more distant relatives by blood or marriage. Yet sons-in-law are, apart from spouses and children, the family members most often encountered in last wills. The author’s analysis of the wills indicates that neither betrothal, nor marriage or payment of dowry put an end to contacts between the son-in-law and the in-laws. One the contrary, in burgher families sons-in-law often became associates in economic activities, representing the interests of not just their wives, but also their in-laws. At the same time, it seems significant that husbands of daughters were best captured in wills where there were no adult male descendants in the family, which enabled them, to some extent, to assume filial powers and privileges. At the same time, the son-in-law’s high position within the family may have made his father-in- law — the testator — who was in conflict with him fear for the future of both his widowed wife and his orphaned children. Thus the position of the daughters’ husbands was not strictly defined by custom, and their role as well as influence in their spouses’ families depended on various factors, including whether the family was part of urban society, whether there existed personal ties or other male relatives.
是女儿的丈夫,姻亲的同事还是对家庭的威胁?从1541 - 1560年的遗嘱看女婿在市民家庭中的地位。本文探讨了利沃夫近代早期市民家庭中女婿地位的相关问题。这篇文章的结论是以16世纪的遗嘱为依据的。作为自我文件-个人文件-遗嘱包含了与各种亲属的私人关系的信息,是研究家庭生活规范的不可替代的来源。女婿与其配偶的家庭之间的关系问题,以前在有关这一问题的文献中没有论及。大多数作者都把重点放在分析分子家庭的功能上,而忽略了远亲之间的血缘或婚姻关系。然而,除了配偶和子女,女婿是遗嘱中最常出现的家庭成员。作者对遗嘱的分析表明,无论是聘礼、结婚还是支付嫁妆,都不能终止女婿与姻亲之间的联系。相反,在市民家庭中,女婿经常成为经济活动中的伙伴,不仅代表他们妻子的利益,还代表他们公婆的利益。同时,似乎很重要的一点是,女儿的丈夫最好在没有成年男性后代的家庭中留下遗嘱,这在一定程度上使他们能够承担孝顺的权力和特权。与此同时,女婿在家庭中的高地位可能使与他有冲突的岳父——立遗嘱人——担心他寡居的妻子和孤儿的未来。因此,女儿丈夫的地位并不是由习俗严格界定的,他们在配偶家庭中的角色和影响取决于各种因素,包括家庭是否属于城市社会的一部分,是否存在个人关系或其他男性亲属。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信