Xulong Zhu, B-L Huo, Qingxia Zhao, Lingguo Wang, Jia Ma
{"title":"Analysis of Application of CBL and PBL Teaching Methods in Clinical Teaching of Breast Surgery","authors":"Xulong Zhu, B-L Huo, Qingxia Zhao, Lingguo Wang, Jia Ma","doi":"10.18282/l-e.v10i8.3069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze the clinical teaching characteristics of breast surgery and discuss the effect and practical value \nof CBL (Case-Based Learning) and PBL (Problem-Based Learning) teaching methods. Method: According to study, we brought \ninto labelling and exclusion criteria and 100 breast surgery patients admitted to our hospital were selected as research objects from \nJanuary 2020 to December 2021. Twenty interns who received clinical teaching were selected as the research objects. The two \ngroups of subjects were randomly divided into 10+50 groups. There were 10 interns and 50 patients in the control group and 10 \ninterns and 50 patients in the experimental group. The control group received LBL (Lecture-Based Learning) for teaching, and \nthe interns performed surgical treatment on the patients; The experimental group received CBL+PBL teaching, and the interns \nperformed surgical treatment on the patients. Then compare the effectiveness of patients’ treatment, the theoretical scores, practical \nscores and teaching satisfaction of the two groups of interns. Result: Under different clinical teaching interventions, the treatment \nefficiency of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group. At the same time, the average scores \nof interns in the experimental group in theory and practice were higher than those in the control group, and their satisfaction with \nthe teaching content and methods was also significantly higher than that in the control group. Difference between the two groups \nhas statistical significance. (P<0.05) Conclusion: Problem-Based Learning and Case-Based Learning clinical teaching methods are \neffective and have value for promotion.","PeriodicalId":199440,"journal":{"name":"Learning & Education","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v10i8.3069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the clinical teaching characteristics of breast surgery and discuss the effect and practical value
of CBL (Case-Based Learning) and PBL (Problem-Based Learning) teaching methods. Method: According to study, we brought
into labelling and exclusion criteria and 100 breast surgery patients admitted to our hospital were selected as research objects from
January 2020 to December 2021. Twenty interns who received clinical teaching were selected as the research objects. The two
groups of subjects were randomly divided into 10+50 groups. There were 10 interns and 50 patients in the control group and 10
interns and 50 patients in the experimental group. The control group received LBL (Lecture-Based Learning) for teaching, and
the interns performed surgical treatment on the patients; The experimental group received CBL+PBL teaching, and the interns
performed surgical treatment on the patients. Then compare the effectiveness of patients’ treatment, the theoretical scores, practical
scores and teaching satisfaction of the two groups of interns. Result: Under different clinical teaching interventions, the treatment
efficiency of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group. At the same time, the average scores
of interns in the experimental group in theory and practice were higher than those in the control group, and their satisfaction with
the teaching content and methods was also significantly higher than that in the control group. Difference between the two groups
has statistical significance. (P<0.05) Conclusion: Problem-Based Learning and Case-Based Learning clinical teaching methods are
effective and have value for promotion.