Analysis of Application of CBL and PBL Teaching Methods in Clinical Teaching of Breast Surgery

Xulong Zhu, B-L Huo, Qingxia Zhao, Lingguo Wang, Jia Ma
{"title":"Analysis of Application of CBL and PBL Teaching Methods in Clinical Teaching of Breast Surgery","authors":"Xulong Zhu, B-L Huo, Qingxia Zhao, Lingguo Wang, Jia Ma","doi":"10.18282/l-e.v10i8.3069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze the clinical teaching characteristics of breast surgery and discuss the effect and practical value \nof CBL (Case-Based Learning) and PBL (Problem-Based Learning) teaching methods. Method: According to study, we brought \ninto labelling and exclusion criteria and 100 breast surgery patients admitted to our hospital were selected as research objects from \nJanuary 2020 to December 2021. Twenty interns who received clinical teaching were selected as the research objects. The two \ngroups of subjects were randomly divided into 10+50 groups. There were 10 interns and 50 patients in the control group and 10 \ninterns and 50 patients in the experimental group. The control group received LBL (Lecture-Based Learning) for teaching, and \nthe interns performed surgical treatment on the patients; The experimental group received CBL+PBL teaching, and the interns \nperformed surgical treatment on the patients. Then compare the effectiveness of patients’ treatment, the theoretical scores, practical \nscores and teaching satisfaction of the two groups of interns. Result: Under different clinical teaching interventions, the treatment \nefficiency of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group. At the same time, the average scores \nof interns in the experimental group in theory and practice were higher than those in the control group, and their satisfaction with \nthe teaching content and methods was also significantly higher than that in the control group. Difference between the two groups \nhas statistical significance. (P<0.05) Conclusion: Problem-Based Learning and Case-Based Learning clinical teaching methods are \neffective and have value for promotion.","PeriodicalId":199440,"journal":{"name":"Learning &amp; Education","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning &amp; Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v10i8.3069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the clinical teaching characteristics of breast surgery and discuss the effect and practical value of CBL (Case-Based Learning) and PBL (Problem-Based Learning) teaching methods. Method: According to study, we brought into labelling and exclusion criteria and 100 breast surgery patients admitted to our hospital were selected as research objects from January 2020 to December 2021. Twenty interns who received clinical teaching were selected as the research objects. The two groups of subjects were randomly divided into 10+50 groups. There were 10 interns and 50 patients in the control group and 10 interns and 50 patients in the experimental group. The control group received LBL (Lecture-Based Learning) for teaching, and the interns performed surgical treatment on the patients; The experimental group received CBL+PBL teaching, and the interns performed surgical treatment on the patients. Then compare the effectiveness of patients’ treatment, the theoretical scores, practical scores and teaching satisfaction of the two groups of interns. Result: Under different clinical teaching interventions, the treatment efficiency of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group. At the same time, the average scores of interns in the experimental group in theory and practice were higher than those in the control group, and their satisfaction with the teaching content and methods was also significantly higher than that in the control group. Difference between the two groups has statistical significance. (P<0.05) Conclusion: Problem-Based Learning and Case-Based Learning clinical teaching methods are effective and have value for promotion.
CBL与PBL教学法在乳腺外科临床教学中的应用分析
目的:分析乳腺外科临床教学特点,探讨CBL (Case-Based Learning)和PBL (Problem-Based Learning)教学方法的效果和实用价值。方法:根据研究纳入标签和排除标准,选取2020年1月至2021年12月我院收治的100例乳房手术患者作为研究对象。选取20名接受临床教学的实习生作为研究对象。两组受试者随机分为10+50组。对照组实习生10名,患者50例;实验组实习生10名,患者50例。对照组采用LBL (Lecture-Based Learning)授课,由实习生对患者进行手术治疗;实验组采用CBL+PBL教学,由实习生对患者进行手术治疗。比较两组实习生对患者的治疗效果、理论评分、实践评分和教学满意度。结果:在不同的临床教学干预措施下,实验组的治疗效果显著高于对照组。同时,实验组实习生在理论和实践方面的平均得分均高于对照组,对教学内容和教学方法的满意度也显著高于对照组。两组间差异有统计学意义。结论:基于问题的学习和基于案例的学习是有效的临床教学方法,具有推广价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信