Is ontology-based activity recognition really effective?

Daniele Riboni, L. Pareschi, Laura Radaelli, C. Bettini
{"title":"Is ontology-based activity recognition really effective?","authors":"Daniele Riboni, L. Pareschi, Laura Radaelli, C. Bettini","doi":"10.1109/PERCOMW.2011.5766927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While most activity recognition systems rely on data-driven approaches, the use of knowledge-driven techniques is gaining increasing interest. Research in this field has mainly concentrated on the use of ontologies to specify the semantics of activities, and ontological reasoning to recognize them based on context information. However, at the time of writing, the experimental evaluation of these techniques is limited to computational aspects; their actual effectiveness is still unknown. As a first step to fill this gap, in this paper, we experimentally evaluate the effectiveness of the ontological approach, using an activity dataset collected in a smart-home setting. Preliminary results suggest that existing ontological techniques underperform data-driven ones, mainly because they lack support for reasoning with temporal information. Indeed, we show that, when ontological techniques are extended with even simple forms of temporal reasoning, their effectiveness is comparable to the one of a state-of-the-art technique based on Hidden Markov Models. Then, we indicate possible research directions to further improve the effectiveness of ontology-based activity recognition through temporal reasoning.","PeriodicalId":369430,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"102","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2011.5766927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102

Abstract

While most activity recognition systems rely on data-driven approaches, the use of knowledge-driven techniques is gaining increasing interest. Research in this field has mainly concentrated on the use of ontologies to specify the semantics of activities, and ontological reasoning to recognize them based on context information. However, at the time of writing, the experimental evaluation of these techniques is limited to computational aspects; their actual effectiveness is still unknown. As a first step to fill this gap, in this paper, we experimentally evaluate the effectiveness of the ontological approach, using an activity dataset collected in a smart-home setting. Preliminary results suggest that existing ontological techniques underperform data-driven ones, mainly because they lack support for reasoning with temporal information. Indeed, we show that, when ontological techniques are extended with even simple forms of temporal reasoning, their effectiveness is comparable to the one of a state-of-the-art technique based on Hidden Markov Models. Then, we indicate possible research directions to further improve the effectiveness of ontology-based activity recognition through temporal reasoning.
基于本体的活动识别真的有效吗?
虽然大多数活动识别系统依赖于数据驱动的方法,但使用知识驱动的技术正在获得越来越多的兴趣。该领域的研究主要集中在使用本体来指定活动的语义,以及基于上下文信息的本体推理来识别活动。然而,在撰写本文时,这些技术的实验评估仅限于计算方面;它们的实际效果仍不得而知。作为填补这一空白的第一步,在本文中,我们使用在智能家居环境中收集的活动数据集,实验评估了本体论方法的有效性。初步结果表明,现有的本体论技术不如数据驱动的技术,主要是因为它们缺乏对时间信息推理的支持。事实上,我们表明,当本体论技术扩展到甚至简单的时间推理形式时,其有效性可与基于隐马尔可夫模型的最先进技术相媲美。在此基础上,提出了通过时间推理进一步提高基于本体的活动识别有效性的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信