Psychometric Concerns in the Assessment of Trauma-Related Symptoms in Older Adults

W. V. Zelst, A. Beekman
{"title":"Psychometric Concerns in the Assessment of Trauma-Related Symptoms in Older Adults","authors":"W. V. Zelst, A. Beekman","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195399066.013.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in older adults is still in its infancy despite reflections on this subject in past literature. Factors that influence assessment are traumas that occurred long in the past, lower prevalence, the fact that older people complain less, more misinterpretation of avoiding and intrusion symptoms, more somatic comorbidity, and higher risk of cognitive impairment. The Clinician Administered PTSD Scale is mostly used to diagnose PTSD, but is less researched in older individuals. Only two screening instruments have been validated specifically for older adults, the PTSD Checklist (PCL) and the Self-Rating Inventory for PTSD. The PCL scale has been used more often, has been translated in various languages, and is also suitable for clinician rating, which is considered more appropriate for older adults. The PCL-5, based on the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria was researched in older veterans but needs further validation. Biological measures have not yet been adapted for assessment in the complex biological systems of older age. Multimethod assessment and computerized screening are becoming more important and can address many of the difficulties in this field. Finally, much can be learned from knowledge already acquired from younger adults.","PeriodicalId":177564,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Traumatic Stress Disorders, Second Edition","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Traumatic Stress Disorders, Second Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195399066.013.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in older adults is still in its infancy despite reflections on this subject in past literature. Factors that influence assessment are traumas that occurred long in the past, lower prevalence, the fact that older people complain less, more misinterpretation of avoiding and intrusion symptoms, more somatic comorbidity, and higher risk of cognitive impairment. The Clinician Administered PTSD Scale is mostly used to diagnose PTSD, but is less researched in older individuals. Only two screening instruments have been validated specifically for older adults, the PTSD Checklist (PCL) and the Self-Rating Inventory for PTSD. The PCL scale has been used more often, has been translated in various languages, and is also suitable for clinician rating, which is considered more appropriate for older adults. The PCL-5, based on the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria was researched in older veterans but needs further validation. Biological measures have not yet been adapted for assessment in the complex biological systems of older age. Multimethod assessment and computerized screening are becoming more important and can address many of the difficulties in this field. Finally, much can be learned from knowledge already acquired from younger adults.
老年人创伤相关症状评估中的心理测量问题
尽管在过去的文献中对这一主题进行了反思,但对老年人创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的评估仍处于起步阶段。影响评估的因素有:过去长期发生的创伤、患病率较低、老年人抱怨较少、对回避和侵入症状的误解较多、躯体合并症较多、认知障碍风险较高。临床医生管理的PTSD量表主要用于诊断PTSD,但对老年人的研究较少。只有两种筛查工具专门针对老年人进行了验证,PTSD检查表(PCL)和PTSD自评量表。PCL量表使用更频繁,已被翻译成各种语言,也适用于临床医生评分,这被认为更适合老年人。PCL-5基于新的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版,该标准在老年退伍军人中进行了研究,但需要进一步验证。生物测量还没有适应于评估老年复杂的生物系统。多方法评估和计算机筛选变得越来越重要,可以解决这一领域的许多困难。最后,从年轻人那里已经获得的知识可以学到很多东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信