Can we trust subjective logic for information fusion?

J. Dezert, A. Tchamova, Deqiang Han, J. Tacnet
{"title":"Can we trust subjective logic for information fusion?","authors":"J. Dezert, A. Tchamova, Deqiang Han, J. Tacnet","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.22865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we provide a deep examination of the main bases of Subjective Logic (SL) and reveal serious problems with them. A new interesting alternative way for building a normal coarsened basic belief assignment from a refined one is also proposed. The defects in the SL fusion rule and the problems in the link between opinion and Beta probability density functions are also analyzed. Some numerical examples and related analyses are provided to justify our viewpoints.","PeriodicalId":136004,"journal":{"name":"17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.22865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a deep examination of the main bases of Subjective Logic (SL) and reveal serious problems with them. A new interesting alternative way for building a normal coarsened basic belief assignment from a refined one is also proposed. The defects in the SL fusion rule and the problems in the link between opinion and Beta probability density functions are also analyzed. Some numerical examples and related analyses are provided to justify our viewpoints.
我们能相信信息融合的主观逻辑吗?
本文对主观逻辑的主要基础进行了深入的考察,揭示了主观逻辑存在的一些严重问题。本文还提出了一种新的有趣的替代方法,用于从一个精炼的基本信念分配中构建一个正常的粗化基本信念分配。分析了SL融合规则的缺陷以及意见与Beta概率密度函数之间的联系存在的问题。给出了一些数值算例和相关分析来证明我们的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信