Efficiency evaluation and architecture design of SSD unities for the H.264/AVC standard

G. Sanchez, F. Sampaio, Robson Dornelles, L. Agostini
{"title":"Efficiency evaluation and architecture design of SSD unities for the H.264/AVC standard","authors":"G. Sanchez, F. Sampaio, Robson Dornelles, L. Agostini","doi":"10.1109/SPL.2010.5483019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the design and evaluation of architectures that performs the SSD (Sum of Squared Differences) similarity criterion calculation. The comparison was made with other widely used criterion: the SAD (Sum of Absolute Differences). In order to compare the impact of both criteria in the coding process, a set of executions using the JM 16.0 reference software were performed. In these tests, SSD almost ever got a better video quality than SAD. Three architectures are proposed to perform SSD: (a) the first one uses a multiplexer, (b) the second uses a memory and (c) the last one uses a dedicated multiplier. One architecture to perform SAD is proposed to be compared with the architectures using SSD. Each solution was described in VHDL and synthesized to an Altera Stratix II FPGA. The video quality gain using SSD over the SAD encourages the use of SSD calculators even with a lower operation frequency when compared with an SAD implementation. In the best case and considering HDTV 1080p videos (1920×1080 pixels), it is possible to reach real time processing (30 frames per second) by putting 12 SSD calculators working in parallel.","PeriodicalId":372692,"journal":{"name":"2010 VI Southern Programmable Logic Conference (SPL)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 VI Southern Programmable Logic Conference (SPL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPL.2010.5483019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper presents the design and evaluation of architectures that performs the SSD (Sum of Squared Differences) similarity criterion calculation. The comparison was made with other widely used criterion: the SAD (Sum of Absolute Differences). In order to compare the impact of both criteria in the coding process, a set of executions using the JM 16.0 reference software were performed. In these tests, SSD almost ever got a better video quality than SAD. Three architectures are proposed to perform SSD: (a) the first one uses a multiplexer, (b) the second uses a memory and (c) the last one uses a dedicated multiplier. One architecture to perform SAD is proposed to be compared with the architectures using SSD. Each solution was described in VHDL and synthesized to an Altera Stratix II FPGA. The video quality gain using SSD over the SAD encourages the use of SSD calculators even with a lower operation frequency when compared with an SAD implementation. In the best case and considering HDTV 1080p videos (1920×1080 pixels), it is possible to reach real time processing (30 frames per second) by putting 12 SSD calculators working in parallel.
基于H.264/AVC标准的SSD设备效率评估与体系结构设计
本文介绍了执行差异平方和相似准则计算的体系结构的设计和评估。与其他广泛使用的标准SAD(绝对差异和)进行了比较。为了比较这两个标准在编码过程中的影响,使用JM 16.0参考软件执行了一组执行。在这些测试中,SSD的视频质量几乎都优于SSD。提出了三种架构来执行SSD:(a)第一个使用多路复用器,(b)第二个使用内存,(c)最后一个使用专用乘法器。提出了一种执行SSD的体系结构,并与使用SSD的体系结构进行了比较。每种解决方案都用VHDL进行了描述,并合成到Altera Stratix II FPGA上。使用SSD而不是SAD的视频质量增益鼓励使用SSD计算器,即使与SAD实现相比,其操作频率更低。在最好的情况下,考虑到HDTV 1080p视频(1920×1080像素),通过将12个SSD计算器并行工作,可以达到实时处理(每秒30帧)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信