Testing for the Robustness of Okun’s Law With Breakpoint Analysis: Evidence From Korea

Hyun-Jae Rhee
{"title":"Testing for the Robustness of Okun’s Law With Breakpoint Analysis: Evidence From Korea","authors":"Hyun-Jae Rhee","doi":"10.16980/jitc.14.2.201804.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study re-evaluated Okun’s law by applying breakpoint analysis; concerning this, the study analyzed six models including the first differenced, modified, and gap models. Empirical evidence reveals that models without breakpoints support the proposition of the conventional Okun’s law, even though the estimated Okun’s coefficients do not match up to the expected values. A few models with breakpoints also support Okun’s law at all the breakpoints. Apparently, the robustness of Okun’s law has been demonstrated in the Korean economy. However, the signs of Okun’s coefficients have been mixed in the gap model since the 2000s. Such changes provide robust evidence that Okun’s law has been weak since the 2000s. Therefore, Okun’s law may not hold if it discusses the potential real GDP and full employment. Taken together, it can be said that the effectiveness of an employment policy based on the manipulation of the national income level may be questionable in the Korean economy. Particularly, when the policy, potential real GDP, and full employment are interrelated, it has to be elaborately established to maximize the effectiveness of the policy.","PeriodicalId":125977,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Employment","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Employment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.14.2.201804.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study re-evaluated Okun’s law by applying breakpoint analysis; concerning this, the study analyzed six models including the first differenced, modified, and gap models. Empirical evidence reveals that models without breakpoints support the proposition of the conventional Okun’s law, even though the estimated Okun’s coefficients do not match up to the expected values. A few models with breakpoints also support Okun’s law at all the breakpoints. Apparently, the robustness of Okun’s law has been demonstrated in the Korean economy. However, the signs of Okun’s coefficients have been mixed in the gap model since the 2000s. Such changes provide robust evidence that Okun’s law has been weak since the 2000s. Therefore, Okun’s law may not hold if it discusses the potential real GDP and full employment. Taken together, it can be said that the effectiveness of an employment policy based on the manipulation of the national income level may be questionable in the Korean economy. Particularly, when the policy, potential real GDP, and full employment are interrelated, it has to be elaborately established to maximize the effectiveness of the policy.
用断点分析检验奥肯定律的稳健性:来自韩国的证据
本文运用断点分析方法对奥肯定律进行了重新评价;为此,本研究分析了六种模型,包括第一差分模型、修正模型和差距模型。经验证据表明,没有断点的模型支持传统奥肯定律的命题,即使估计的奥肯系数与期望值不匹配。一些带有断点的模型在所有断点处也支持奥肯定律。显然,奥肯定律的坚固性在韩国经济中得到了证明。然而,自2000年代以来,奥肯系数的迹象在缺口模型中一直是混合的。这些变化提供了强有力的证据,证明奥肯定律自2000年代以来一直很弱。因此,如果讨论潜在实际GDP和充分就业,奥肯定律可能就不成立了。综上所言,在韩国经济中,以操纵国民收入水平为基础的雇佣政策的有效性值得怀疑。特别是,当政策、潜在实际GDP和充分就业三者相互关联时,必须精心制定,以使政策的有效性最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信