A few words about dignity: An introspective study of a person with disability

Agnieszka Dul
{"title":"A few words about dignity: An introspective study of a person with disability","authors":"Agnieszka Dul","doi":"10.26881/bp.2022.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article, I present issues of presence, existential absence, and the sense of dignity of a person with a disability. I present these issues for the first time and attempt to show disability “from within”, a perspective to which I am no stranger as I myself am disabled. The issues of presence, absence and human dignity have always fascinated me. Hence, in this text, they are “filtered” through my dramatic and sometimes even traumatic personal experiences. In conveying these experiences, I never forget what human existence should be – the fact that there should be dignity, presence and being. Is my human experience marked by this? At some point in the text I make a “moral accusation” in connection with this issue. Additionally, I have never forgotten (and will never forget) the person who helped me to “reborn” for myself, people and the world. “The significant person and her achievement in relation to the author” is my modest expression of gratitude to someone because of whom I LIVE. However, the central points of reference in this text are questions of human dignity and presence. They form its axis and are its guiding categories of analysis. I conclude by stating that these are important, even essential issues in order to understand the phenomenon of what it is to be human. And to be unique in that humanity. The main research question which I pose is the following: Does society see that people with disabilities have dignity? Furthermore, the thesis I propose and which I believe arises from this question is: society has little recognition of the dignity of people with disabilities. More specific research questions will be quoted below in the text which, in terms of methodology, has been written using an autoethnographic approach (Wolcott 2004, Kacperczyk 2014, Urbańska 2012). The choice of this highly qualitative methodology was guided by the assumption that autoethnography allows a subjective presentation of specific fragments of those events inscribed in the category of human dignity described here. This will be an analytical autoethnography, after Canagarajah (2012), because through writing I analyze the emotional, mental and situational states that I have had to face in the past, while some of the experiences that generated these states resonate with me to the present. Last but not least, it is my hope that my openly described states of mind will contribute to some betterment of this particular area of human existence in its extremely important, social and cultural dimensions.","PeriodicalId":345953,"journal":{"name":"Beyond Philology An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyond Philology An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2022.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article, I present issues of presence, existential absence, and the sense of dignity of a person with a disability. I present these issues for the first time and attempt to show disability “from within”, a perspective to which I am no stranger as I myself am disabled. The issues of presence, absence and human dignity have always fascinated me. Hence, in this text, they are “filtered” through my dramatic and sometimes even traumatic personal experiences. In conveying these experiences, I never forget what human existence should be – the fact that there should be dignity, presence and being. Is my human experience marked by this? At some point in the text I make a “moral accusation” in connection with this issue. Additionally, I have never forgotten (and will never forget) the person who helped me to “reborn” for myself, people and the world. “The significant person and her achievement in relation to the author” is my modest expression of gratitude to someone because of whom I LIVE. However, the central points of reference in this text are questions of human dignity and presence. They form its axis and are its guiding categories of analysis. I conclude by stating that these are important, even essential issues in order to understand the phenomenon of what it is to be human. And to be unique in that humanity. The main research question which I pose is the following: Does society see that people with disabilities have dignity? Furthermore, the thesis I propose and which I believe arises from this question is: society has little recognition of the dignity of people with disabilities. More specific research questions will be quoted below in the text which, in terms of methodology, has been written using an autoethnographic approach (Wolcott 2004, Kacperczyk 2014, Urbańska 2012). The choice of this highly qualitative methodology was guided by the assumption that autoethnography allows a subjective presentation of specific fragments of those events inscribed in the category of human dignity described here. This will be an analytical autoethnography, after Canagarajah (2012), because through writing I analyze the emotional, mental and situational states that I have had to face in the past, while some of the experiences that generated these states resonate with me to the present. Last but not least, it is my hope that my openly described states of mind will contribute to some betterment of this particular area of human existence in its extremely important, social and cultural dimensions.
关于尊严的几句话:一个残疾人的内省研究
在这篇文章中,我提出了一个残疾人的存在、存在缺失和尊严感的问题。我第一次提出这些问题,并试图“从内部”展示残疾,这是一个我并不陌生的视角,因为我自己就是残疾人。存在、缺失和人类尊严的问题一直让我着迷。因此,在本文中,它们是通过我戏剧性的,有时甚至是创伤性的个人经历“过滤”出来的。在传达这些经历的过程中,我从未忘记人类的存在应该是什么——应该有尊严、存在和存在。我的人生经历是这样的吗?在文章的某些地方,我对这个问题提出了“道德指责”。此外,我从来没有忘记(也永远不会忘记)帮助我为自己、为他人、为世界“重生”的人。“与作者相关的重要人物和她的成就”是我对我赖以生存的人的谦逊表达。然而,本文参考的中心点是人的尊严和存在的问题。它们构成了它的轴心,是它的分析的指导范畴。最后我要说的是,这些都是重要的,甚至是必不可少的问题,以便理解什么是人类的现象。在人性中独树一帜。我提出的主要研究问题是:社会是否认为残疾人有尊严?此外,我提出的论点,我认为是由这个问题产生的:社会很少承认残疾人的尊严。更具体的研究问题将在下面的文本中引用,就方法而言,已经使用自民族志方法编写(Wolcott 2004, Kacperczyk 2014, Urbańska 2012)。选择这种高度定性的方法是基于这样一种假设,即自我民族志允许对这些事件的特定片段进行主观呈现,这些事件被铭刻在这里描述的人类尊严的范畴中。在《Canagarajah》(2012)之后,这将是一本分析性的自我民族志,因为通过写作,我分析了我过去不得不面对的情感、精神和情境状态,而产生这些状态的一些经历至今仍与我产生共鸣。最后但并非最不重要的是,我希望我公开描述的精神状态将有助于在极其重要的社会和文化方面改善人类生存的这一特定领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信