МЕТОДОЛОГІЧНІ ПІДГРУНТЯ ІДЕНТИФІКАЦІЇ ДЕСКРИПТОРІВ ТА КОНТУРІВ УПРАВЛІННЯ СОЦІАЛЬНО-ЕКОНОМІЧНИХ СИСТЕМ

Світлана Владиславівна Бурлуцька, С. В. Бурлуцький
{"title":"МЕТОДОЛОГІЧНІ ПІДГРУНТЯ ІДЕНТИФІКАЦІЇ ДЕСКРИПТОРІВ ТА КОНТУРІВ УПРАВЛІННЯ СОЦІАЛЬНО-ЕКОНОМІЧНИХ СИСТЕМ","authors":"Світлана Владиславівна Бурлуцька, С. В. Бурлуцький","doi":"10.32620/cher.2021.4.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Use of the system approach to management of social and economic processes is connected with existence of the immanent contradiction caused by a high level of abstraction of the definition \"system\" and a considerable level of concreteness of real economic tasks. The mentioned thesis needs formalization of descriptors of socio-economic systems and identification of basic management contours. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the necessity of using a systematic approach to the construction of the socio-economic system construct based on the identification of relevant descriptors and management contours. The methodological basis of the study was a combination of the Marxist school of political economy, the modern economic mainstream and unorthodox currents within the systemic paradigm. The main hypothesis of the study was the assumption regarding the possibility and feasibility of using descriptive methodology of systems identification to the needs of management of socio-economic systems. Statement of the basic material. On the basis of the analysis, a certain basis is provided for the formation of correlations of correspondence of the descriptors of the national socio-economic system to the corresponding axiomatic conditions and basic components. It is proved that the dualistic understanding of the individual as an economic and institutional basic element of the socio-economic system is fully appropriate to the understanding of the essence of the national economy. Institutions should be seen as a structure of connections that combine the elements into a unified integrity. It is proved that the state and its institutions play a dialectical role in ensuring the integral existence of the national socio-economic system of market type. Originality and practical significance of the research. The resulting theoretical and methodological concept has theoretical significance and can be transformed into relevant tools for the development of scientific and practical recommendations on the management of socio-economic systems. Conclusions and prospects for further research. The results of generalization of theoretical statements on the essence and content of the definitions of \"socio-economic system\" and \"national economy\" led to the conclusion about the impossibility of considering the economic subsystem (national economy) separately from other subsystems. The expediency and sufficiency of the use of the definition \"national socio-economic system\" as more acceptable for solving the dialectical unity of social and economic subsystems of society was proved. Further research will focus on the development of the methodical support for the identification of management contours on the basis of socio-economic descriptors","PeriodicalId":268092,"journal":{"name":"TIME DESCRIPTION OF ECONOMIC REFORMS","volume":"181 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TIME DESCRIPTION OF ECONOMIC REFORMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32620/cher.2021.4.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Use of the system approach to management of social and economic processes is connected with existence of the immanent contradiction caused by a high level of abstraction of the definition "system" and a considerable level of concreteness of real economic tasks. The mentioned thesis needs formalization of descriptors of socio-economic systems and identification of basic management contours. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the necessity of using a systematic approach to the construction of the socio-economic system construct based on the identification of relevant descriptors and management contours. The methodological basis of the study was a combination of the Marxist school of political economy, the modern economic mainstream and unorthodox currents within the systemic paradigm. The main hypothesis of the study was the assumption regarding the possibility and feasibility of using descriptive methodology of systems identification to the needs of management of socio-economic systems. Statement of the basic material. On the basis of the analysis, a certain basis is provided for the formation of correlations of correspondence of the descriptors of the national socio-economic system to the corresponding axiomatic conditions and basic components. It is proved that the dualistic understanding of the individual as an economic and institutional basic element of the socio-economic system is fully appropriate to the understanding of the essence of the national economy. Institutions should be seen as a structure of connections that combine the elements into a unified integrity. It is proved that the state and its institutions play a dialectical role in ensuring the integral existence of the national socio-economic system of market type. Originality and practical significance of the research. The resulting theoretical and methodological concept has theoretical significance and can be transformed into relevant tools for the development of scientific and practical recommendations on the management of socio-economic systems. Conclusions and prospects for further research. The results of generalization of theoretical statements on the essence and content of the definitions of "socio-economic system" and "national economy" led to the conclusion about the impossibility of considering the economic subsystem (national economy) separately from other subsystems. The expediency and sufficiency of the use of the definition "national socio-economic system" as more acceptable for solving the dialectical unity of social and economic subsystems of society was proved. Further research will focus on the development of the methodical support for the identification of management contours on the basis of socio-economic descriptors
使用系统方法来管理社会和经济过程与“系统”定义的高度抽象和实际经济任务的相当程度的具体性所造成的内在矛盾的存在有关。上述论文需要社会经济系统描述符的形式化和基本管理轮廓的确定。本文的目的是在确定相关描述符和管理轮廓的基础上,证明使用系统方法构建社会经济体系结构的必要性。该研究的方法论基础是马克思主义政治经济学学派、现代经济学主流和系统范式内的非正统思潮的结合。这项研究的主要假设是关于使用系统识别的描述性方法来满足社会经济系统管理需要的可能性和可行性的假设。基本材料陈述。在此基础上,为形成国家社会经济制度描述符与相应的公理条件和基本成分的对应关系提供了一定的依据。事实证明,对个人作为社会经济系统的经济和制度基本要素的二元理解与对国民经济本质的理解是完全合适的。制度应该被看作是一个连接的结构,它把各个要素结合成一个统一的完整性。事实证明,国家及其制度在保证市场型国家社会经济体制完整存在的过程中起着辩证作用。本研究具有独创性和现实意义。由此产生的理论和方法概念具有理论意义,可以转化为制定有关社会经济系统管理的科学和实际建议的相关工具。结论及进一步研究的展望。对“社会经济系统”和“国民经济”定义的本质和内容的理论表述进行归纳,得出经济子系统(国民经济)不可能与其他子系统分开考虑的结论。使用“国家社会经济制度”的定义对于解决社会的社会子系统和经济子系统的辩证统一是更容易接受的,这证明了它的权宜之计和充分性。进一步的研究将集中于发展有系统的支助,以便根据社会经济描述符确定管理等高线
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信