Case study: evaluation of IKM Emergent from a complexity perspective

S. Cummings, M. Powell
{"title":"Case study: evaluation of IKM Emergent from a complexity perspective","authors":"S. Cummings, M. Powell","doi":"10.1080/19474199.2012.686056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case study describes the evaluation of the IKM Emergent Research Programme which took place over the 2008–2011 period. The paper has been written by the co-directors of the programme and reflects on the process of the evaluation which was undertaken by two external consultants. The methodology of the evaluation comprised: drawing together other evaluations already being undertaken by programme projects; encouraging reflection and reflexivity among programme participants; and engaging a Southern evaluator. The case study first provides a brief overview of the IKM Emergent Research Programme. It then reviews the methodology followed in the evaluation and provides an overview of the main conclusions of the evaluation which were generally very positive. The many strengths of the evaluation are outlined as are some of the weaknesses in the opinion of the authors. In the final section, the case study argues that the evaluation fits within the tradition of adaptive pluralism.","PeriodicalId":169185,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management for Development Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management for Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19474199.2012.686056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case study describes the evaluation of the IKM Emergent Research Programme which took place over the 2008–2011 period. The paper has been written by the co-directors of the programme and reflects on the process of the evaluation which was undertaken by two external consultants. The methodology of the evaluation comprised: drawing together other evaluations already being undertaken by programme projects; encouraging reflection and reflexivity among programme participants; and engaging a Southern evaluator. The case study first provides a brief overview of the IKM Emergent Research Programme. It then reviews the methodology followed in the evaluation and provides an overview of the main conclusions of the evaluation which were generally very positive. The many strengths of the evaluation are outlined as are some of the weaknesses in the opinion of the authors. In the final section, the case study argues that the evaluation fits within the tradition of adaptive pluralism.
案例研究:从复杂性的角度评价IKM涌现
本案例研究描述了2008-2011年期间对IKM紧急研究计划的评估。该文件是由方案的联合主任编写的,反映了由两名外部顾问进行的评价过程。评价的方法包括:汇集方案项目已经进行的其他评价;鼓励方案参与者进行反思和反思;并聘请南方评估员。案例研究首先提供了IKM紧急研究计划的简要概述。然后,它审查了评价中所采用的方法,并概述了评价的主要结论,这些结论通常是非常积极的。评估的许多优势被概述,以及一些弱点在作者的意见。在最后一节,案例分析认为这种评价符合适应性多元主义的传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信