A New Evidence Combination Scheme for Decision Assistant

Wanqing Wang, Yongjun Zhao, Jie Huang
{"title":"A New Evidence Combination Scheme for Decision Assistant","authors":"Wanqing Wang, Yongjun Zhao, Jie Huang","doi":"10.1109/CyberC.2012.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In D-S evidence theory, the Dempster's rule always leads to counter-intuitive results when combining conflicting evidences. The methods proposed to solve these problems all simply focus on BBA features, and ignore the decision assistant purpose. In order to get consistent results, a new combination scheme is proposed, which imitates the thinking of our brain, and fuses evidences with different conflict levels by different rules. The new scheme firstly classifies the evidences according to decision support property, then, fuses the BBAs in the same class through classical discounting method, in which the discount factor is related to probability quality, finally, combines the evidences conflicting seriously through another discount way selecting BBA reliability as the factor. The numeric examples show that the new scheme evaluates BBAs from decision assistant point all-time long, and can solve the counter-intuitive paradoxes effectively.","PeriodicalId":416468,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberC.2012.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In D-S evidence theory, the Dempster's rule always leads to counter-intuitive results when combining conflicting evidences. The methods proposed to solve these problems all simply focus on BBA features, and ignore the decision assistant purpose. In order to get consistent results, a new combination scheme is proposed, which imitates the thinking of our brain, and fuses evidences with different conflict levels by different rules. The new scheme firstly classifies the evidences according to decision support property, then, fuses the BBAs in the same class through classical discounting method, in which the discount factor is related to probability quality, finally, combines the evidences conflicting seriously through another discount way selecting BBA reliability as the factor. The numeric examples show that the new scheme evaluates BBAs from decision assistant point all-time long, and can solve the counter-intuitive paradoxes effectively.
一种新的决策辅助证据组合方案
在D-S证据理论中,当将相互矛盾的证据组合在一起时,登普斯特规则总是导致反直觉的结果。目前提出的解决这些问题的方法都是简单地关注BBA特征,而忽略了决策辅助的目的。为了获得一致的结果,提出了一种新的组合方案,该方案模仿大脑的思维,按照不同的规则融合不同冲突程度的证据。该方案首先根据决策支持属性对证据进行分类,然后通过经典的贴现方法将同类证据进行融合,其中贴现因子与概率质量有关,最后通过另一种贴现方法以BBA可靠性为因素对冲突严重的证据进行合并。数值算例表明,该方法从决策辅助点出发,对决策辅助点进行了长时间的评价,有效地解决了反直觉悖论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信