IN-HOSPITAL OUTCOMES OF BILATERAL INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY GRAFTING

A. Frolov, N. Zagorodnikov, S. Ivanov, R. Tarasov
{"title":"IN-HOSPITAL OUTCOMES OF BILATERAL INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY GRAFTING","authors":"A. Frolov, N. Zagorodnikov, S. Ivanov, R. Tarasov","doi":"10.17802/2306-1278-2023-12-2-163-172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HighlightsThe present study was conducted to evaluate in-hospital outcomes of one of the most effective and simultaneously controversial surgical techniques for myocardial revascularization using two internal thoracic arteries (ITA).To this date, this is the most complete analysis that has been carried out at the Research Institute on the topic of studying bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (BITA). The results obtained are of great importance for the subsequent evaluation of long-term results. AbstractAim. To analyze in-hospital outcomes of BITA.Methods. The study included 232 patients who were admitted to the Cardiac Surgery Department for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). All patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the use of either single or bilateral ITA conduits. Both groups included equal number of patients – 116. In-hospital outcomes were analyzed.Results. BITA and CABG with single ITA were proven to be comparable regarding myocardial infarction, stroke, the need for percutaneous coronary intervention, death, and composite endpoint. At the same time BITA patients significantly more often had longer hospital stay and required inotropic drugs.Conclusion. BITA is a safe procedure comparable to classic CABG in terms of in-hospital complications, but at the same time, this intervention is associated with longer hospital stay, and extended inotropic drugs use.","PeriodicalId":227108,"journal":{"name":"Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"177 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2023-12-2-163-172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

HighlightsThe present study was conducted to evaluate in-hospital outcomes of one of the most effective and simultaneously controversial surgical techniques for myocardial revascularization using two internal thoracic arteries (ITA).To this date, this is the most complete analysis that has been carried out at the Research Institute on the topic of studying bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (BITA). The results obtained are of great importance for the subsequent evaluation of long-term results. AbstractAim. To analyze in-hospital outcomes of BITA.Methods. The study included 232 patients who were admitted to the Cardiac Surgery Department for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). All patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the use of either single or bilateral ITA conduits. Both groups included equal number of patients – 116. In-hospital outcomes were analyzed.Results. BITA and CABG with single ITA were proven to be comparable regarding myocardial infarction, stroke, the need for percutaneous coronary intervention, death, and composite endpoint. At the same time BITA patients significantly more often had longer hospital stay and required inotropic drugs.Conclusion. BITA is a safe procedure comparable to classic CABG in terms of in-hospital complications, but at the same time, this intervention is associated with longer hospital stay, and extended inotropic drugs use.
双侧乳腺内动脉植入术的住院效果
本研究旨在评估使用两条胸内动脉(ITA)进行心肌血运重建术的一种最有效但同时也有争议的手术技术的住院结果。到目前为止,这是该研究所对研究双侧胸内动脉移植(BITA)这一主题进行的最完整的分析。所获得的结果对后续的长期结果评价具有重要意义。AbstractAim。目的:分析bita的住院结果。该研究包括232例在心脏外科接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者。所有患者根据单侧或双侧ITA导管的使用情况分为两组。两组患者人数相同,均为116人。分析住院结果。在心肌梗死、卒中、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、死亡和复合终点方面,BITA和单ITA CABG被证明具有可比性。同时,BITA患者住院时间较长,需要使用肌力药物的情况明显增多。就院内并发症而言,BITA是一种与经典CABG相当的安全手术,但与此同时,这种干预与更长的住院时间和延长的肌力药物使用有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信