Comparison of Unstable Per-Trochanteric Fractures Fixed with Proximal Femoral Nail Versus Dynamic Hip Screw Using Harris Hip Score

A. Pak, Inst Med Sci, Badar Munir, A. Shami, M. Hanif, Yasir M. Farhan, N. Manzoor, F. Nawaz, Khan, Rizwan Hameed Malik
{"title":"Comparison of Unstable Per-Trochanteric Fractures Fixed with Proximal Femoral Nail Versus Dynamic Hip Screw Using Harris Hip Score","authors":"A. Pak, Inst Med Sci, Badar Munir, A. Shami, M. Hanif, Yasir M. Farhan, N. Manzoor, F. Nawaz, Khan, Rizwan Hameed Malik","doi":"10.48036/apims.v19i2.811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the frequency of a good functional outcome in unstable per-trochanteric fractures fixed with a dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail using the Harris Hip Score. \nMethodology: A comparative study was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, from June to December 2021. A total of 80 patients with per-trochanteric femur fractures were selected and divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure performed: dynamic hip screw or proximal femoral nail. A comprehensive history and thorough examination were performed for all patients during scheduled follow-up visits. Patients were called in for follow-up assessments at 1 month and 3 months to evaluate the functional outcomes using the Harris Hip Score.\nResults: The mean age of all patients was 58.73±6.78 years. At the 3-month follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Score was significantly higher in the proximal femoral nail group compared to the dynamic hip screw group (84.64±7.05 vs. 73.9±12.53; p = 0.005). The proportion of patients with good functional outcomes (Harris Hip Score ≥ 70 points) was significantly higher in the proximal femoral nail group compared to the dynamic hip screw group (97.5% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.002).\nConclusion: In this study, the proximal femoral nail group demonstrated superior functional outcomes compared to the dynamic hip screw group. The use of proximal femoral nail fixation can provide better outcomes and facilitate an earlier return to pre-injury status for patients.","PeriodicalId":184398,"journal":{"name":"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v19i2.811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the frequency of a good functional outcome in unstable per-trochanteric fractures fixed with a dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail using the Harris Hip Score.  Methodology: A comparative study was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, from June to December 2021. A total of 80 patients with per-trochanteric femur fractures were selected and divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure performed: dynamic hip screw or proximal femoral nail. A comprehensive history and thorough examination were performed for all patients during scheduled follow-up visits. Patients were called in for follow-up assessments at 1 month and 3 months to evaluate the functional outcomes using the Harris Hip Score. Results: The mean age of all patients was 58.73±6.78 years. At the 3-month follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Score was significantly higher in the proximal femoral nail group compared to the dynamic hip screw group (84.64±7.05 vs. 73.9±12.53; p = 0.005). The proportion of patients with good functional outcomes (Harris Hip Score ≥ 70 points) was significantly higher in the proximal femoral nail group compared to the dynamic hip screw group (97.5% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.002). Conclusion: In this study, the proximal femoral nail group demonstrated superior functional outcomes compared to the dynamic hip screw group. The use of proximal femoral nail fixation can provide better outcomes and facilitate an earlier return to pre-injury status for patients.
Harris髋关节评分法比较股骨近端钉与动态髋螺钉固定不稳定股骨粗隆骨折
目的:利用Harris髋关节评分比较动力髋螺钉和股骨近端钉固定不稳定股骨粗隆骨折后良好功能预后的频率。方法:2021年6月至12月在伊斯兰堡巴基斯坦医学科学研究所骨科外科进行了一项比较研究。共选择80例股骨粗隆处骨折患者,并根据手术方式分为两组:动力髋螺钉或股骨近端钉。在预定的随访期间对所有患者进行了全面的病史和彻底的检查。患者被要求在1个月和3个月进行随访评估,使用Harris髋关节评分评估功能结果。结果:患者平均年龄58.73±6.78岁。在3个月的随访中,股骨近端钉组Harris髋关节平均评分明显高于动力髋螺钉组(84.64±7.05比73.9±12.53;P = 0.005)。股骨近端钉组患者功能预后良好(Harris髋关节评分≥70分)的比例明显高于动力髋螺钉组(97.5%比72.5%,p = 0.002)。结论:在本研究中,与动力髋螺钉组相比,股骨近端钉组表现出更好的功能结果。使用股骨近端钉固定可以提供更好的结果,并促进患者早日恢复到损伤前的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信