Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of etomidate-midazolam and ketamine-midazolam combinations in anesthesia induction in coronary artery bypass surgery

A. Camkıran Fırat, Ö. Kömürcü, N. Bayraktar, A. Sezgin, G. Arslan
{"title":"Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of etomidate-midazolam and ketamine-midazolam combinations in anesthesia induction in coronary artery bypass surgery","authors":"A. Camkıran Fırat, Ö. Kömürcü, N. Bayraktar, A. Sezgin, G. Arslan","doi":"10.18663/tjcl.1219943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: We aimed to compare the effects of anesthesia induction on hemodynamic parameters of ketamine-midazolam or etomidate-midazolam combinations and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. \nMaterial and Methods: 40 adult patients undergoing CABG were randomly allocated into two groups for this prospective randomized double-blinded study. Ketamine group (n = 20) and Etomidate group (n = 20). Intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic variables, adrenal gland functions and intensive care period were compared after anesthesia induction with etomidate and ketamine. \nResults: Perioperative hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different between the groups. Despite similar baseline measurements, cortisol levels were significantly higher 5 minutes after induction, during rewarming, and after ACTH stimulation test at postoperative day 1 in group ketamine than group etmidate. The groups were not significantly different in terms of duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, frequency of postoperative delirium, and intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay. \nConclusion: Ketamine-midazolam combination is an acceptable alternative to etomidate-midazolam combination in terms of hemodynamic stability. Compared with the ketamine-midazolam combination, the etomidate-midazolam combination significantly decreased cortisol levels during the intraoperative and early postoperative periods","PeriodicalId":120468,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1219943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: We aimed to compare the effects of anesthesia induction on hemodynamic parameters of ketamine-midazolam or etomidate-midazolam combinations and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Material and Methods: 40 adult patients undergoing CABG were randomly allocated into two groups for this prospective randomized double-blinded study. Ketamine group (n = 20) and Etomidate group (n = 20). Intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic variables, adrenal gland functions and intensive care period were compared after anesthesia induction with etomidate and ketamine. Results: Perioperative hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different between the groups. Despite similar baseline measurements, cortisol levels were significantly higher 5 minutes after induction, during rewarming, and after ACTH stimulation test at postoperative day 1 in group ketamine than group etmidate. The groups were not significantly different in terms of duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, frequency of postoperative delirium, and intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay. Conclusion: Ketamine-midazolam combination is an acceptable alternative to etomidate-midazolam combination in terms of hemodynamic stability. Compared with the ketamine-midazolam combination, the etomidate-midazolam combination significantly decreased cortisol levels during the intraoperative and early postoperative periods
冠脉搭桥手术麻醉诱导中依托咪特-咪达唑仑与氯胺酮-咪达唑仑对血流动力学影响的比较
目的:比较麻醉诱导对氯胺酮-咪达唑仑或依托咪特-咪达唑仑联合手术及冠状动脉搭桥术血流动力学参数的影响。材料和方法:40例接受CABG手术的成年患者随机分为两组,进行前瞻性随机双盲研究。氯胺酮组(n = 20)和依托咪酯组(n = 20)。比较依托咪酯与氯胺酮麻醉诱导后术中、术后血流动力学指标、肾上腺功能及重症监护时间。结果:两组围手术期血流动力学参数差异无统计学意义。尽管基线测量相似,但氯胺酮组在诱导后5分钟、复温期间和术后第1天ACTH刺激试验后的皮质醇水平明显高于乙胺酸组。两组在术后机械通气持续时间、术后谵妄发生频率、重症监护病房和住院时间方面无显著差异。结论:氯胺酮-咪达唑仑联用在血流动力学稳定性方面可替代依托米特-咪达唑仑联用。与氯胺酮-咪达唑仑联合用药相比,依托咪特-咪达唑仑联合用药可显著降低术中及术后早期的皮质醇水平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信