Performance Analysis between HSDPA and EVDO with Mobile Clients

J. A. Esquerra, J. A. P. Díaz
{"title":"Performance Analysis between HSDPA and EVDO with Mobile Clients","authors":"J. A. Esquerra, J. A. P. Díaz","doi":"10.1109/ENC.2009.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work presents a real-case scenario with mobile clients. The main goal of this work is to evaluate the performance of the two most popular third generation technologies (EVDO and HSDPA). The tests were performed at three speeds (60km/h, 80km/h and 100km/h). The tests were conducted in the most careful effort to have the most accurate results. The performance evaluation was based on the throughput (Uplink/Downlink) of each technology. In the results we can see that: HSDPA technology doubles the downlink speeds obtained by EVDO Rev. A. Also with EVDO the loss-rate between 60 km/h to 80km/h was 6.46% and increases to 60.17% at 100km/h. The HSDPA loss-rate results were: 14.85% from 60km/h to 80km/h and 68.64% from 60km/h to 100km/h. Based on the results obtained; we could say that the most suitable technology for symmetric applications in mobile environments is EVDO Rev. A, as the same way we could say that HSDA, will be the most suitable technology for asymmetric requirements in mobile environments. This work provides very helpful information to the potential users to know what technology fits their requirements. Also this information can be useful to the carriers to improve its network and to know what kind of services can provide/offer.","PeriodicalId":273670,"journal":{"name":"2009 Mexican International Conference on Computer Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Mexican International Conference on Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENC.2009.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work presents a real-case scenario with mobile clients. The main goal of this work is to evaluate the performance of the two most popular third generation technologies (EVDO and HSDPA). The tests were performed at three speeds (60km/h, 80km/h and 100km/h). The tests were conducted in the most careful effort to have the most accurate results. The performance evaluation was based on the throughput (Uplink/Downlink) of each technology. In the results we can see that: HSDPA technology doubles the downlink speeds obtained by EVDO Rev. A. Also with EVDO the loss-rate between 60 km/h to 80km/h was 6.46% and increases to 60.17% at 100km/h. The HSDPA loss-rate results were: 14.85% from 60km/h to 80km/h and 68.64% from 60km/h to 100km/h. Based on the results obtained; we could say that the most suitable technology for symmetric applications in mobile environments is EVDO Rev. A, as the same way we could say that HSDA, will be the most suitable technology for asymmetric requirements in mobile environments. This work provides very helpful information to the potential users to know what technology fits their requirements. Also this information can be useful to the carriers to improve its network and to know what kind of services can provide/offer.
基于移动客户端的HSDPA与EVDO性能分析
这项工作展示了一个使用移动客户端的真实场景。这项工作的主要目标是评估两种最流行的第三代技术(EVDO和HSDPA)的性能。试验以三种速度(60公里/小时、80公里/小时和100公里/小时)进行。为了得到最准确的结果,这些测试都进行得非常仔细。性能评估基于每种技术的吞吐量(上行/下行链路)。在结果中我们可以看到:HSDPA技术将EVDO Rev. a的下行速度提高了一倍,并且EVDO在60 km/h到80km/h之间的损失率为6.46%,在100km/h时增加到60.17%。HSDPA损失率结果为:60 ~ 80km/h损失率为14.85%,60 ~ 100km/h损失率为68.64%。根据所得结果;我们可以说,最适合移动环境中对称应用的技术是EVDO Rev. A,同样,我们可以说HSDA将是最适合移动环境中不对称需求的技术。这项工作为潜在用户提供了非常有用的信息,以了解哪些技术符合他们的需求。此外,这些信息可以帮助运营商改善其网络,并了解可以提供什么样的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信