Evaluation of Packet Concatenation Mechanisms for Low Power Devices in Industrial Internet of Things

S. Siddiqui, A. Khan
{"title":"Evaluation of Packet Concatenation Mechanisms for Low Power Devices in Industrial Internet of Things","authors":"S. Siddiqui, A. Khan","doi":"10.1109/INMIC56986.2022.9972988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Packet concatenation at Media Access Control (MAC) layer has a profound impact for the performance of low power devices in the Internet of Things (IoT), often termed as Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). Due to the recent development of enormous packet concatenation schemes, it has become crucial to compare them in order to identify the best method which could fit a specific application scenario for WSN. This paper compares the dynamic duty-cycling based packet concatenation MAC, ADP-MAC (Adaptive and Dynamic Duty-cycle MAC) with concurrent transmission-based MAC primitive PiP (Packet-in-Packet). Simulations have been conducted to compare the single hop performance of 2 schemes based on their Packet delivery Ratio. The detailed implementation for the two protocols has been used for conducting simulation over Avrora emulator. It has been found that ADP-MAC outperforms PiP due to achieving better synchronization between source and sink nodes","PeriodicalId":404424,"journal":{"name":"2022 24th International Multitopic Conference (INMIC)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 24th International Multitopic Conference (INMIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INMIC56986.2022.9972988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Packet concatenation at Media Access Control (MAC) layer has a profound impact for the performance of low power devices in the Internet of Things (IoT), often termed as Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). Due to the recent development of enormous packet concatenation schemes, it has become crucial to compare them in order to identify the best method which could fit a specific application scenario for WSN. This paper compares the dynamic duty-cycling based packet concatenation MAC, ADP-MAC (Adaptive and Dynamic Duty-cycle MAC) with concurrent transmission-based MAC primitive PiP (Packet-in-Packet). Simulations have been conducted to compare the single hop performance of 2 schemes based on their Packet delivery Ratio. The detailed implementation for the two protocols has been used for conducting simulation over Avrora emulator. It has been found that ADP-MAC outperforms PiP due to achieving better synchronization between source and sink nodes
工业物联网中低功耗器件的分组连接机制评估
媒体访问控制(MAC)层的数据包连接对物联网(IoT)中低功耗设备的性能有着深远的影响,通常被称为无线传感器网络(wsn)。由于近年来大量数据包连接方案的发展,为了确定适合无线传感器网络特定应用场景的最佳方法,对它们进行比较变得至关重要。本文比较了基于动态占空比的分组连接MAC、ADP-MAC(自适应动态占空比MAC)和基于并发传输的原始包中包MAC (packet -in- packet)。通过仿真比较了两种方案的单跳传输性能。在Avrora仿真器上对这两个协议的详细实现进行了仿真。研究发现,由于在源节点和汇聚节点之间实现了更好的同步,ADP-MAC优于PiP
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信