The discipline of law : legal education at the intersection of the juridical and the disciplinary

V. Munro
{"title":"The discipline of law : legal education at the intersection of the juridical and the disciplinary","authors":"V. Munro","doi":"10.1080/14760400308522893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to move beyond pre‐existing critiques of legal education as ideological training. Employing emerging interpretations of the Foucaultian concepts of the juridical and the disciplinary, it provides an analysis of the extent to which the expression ‘law as a academic discipline’ refers to more than a distinct body of substantive principles. In particular, it illustrates the extent to which legal education is a discursive practice constituted simultaneously by a substantive construct of juridical power and a catalogue of disciplinary legal methods. \n \nWhile conceding the pervasive ascription of disciplinary power within the overall institutional framework of higher education, this article examines the specifically disciplinary nature of the legal method’. It is submitted that legal education's emphasis upon superficially objective and technical skills permits the perpetuation of juridical legal rhetoric through the ascription of methodological dictates. These methodological dictates discipline the mind of the law student into conformity with the official rhetoric of authority and impartiality that are the characteristic traits of the juridical syntax.","PeriodicalId":107403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760400308522893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article seeks to move beyond pre‐existing critiques of legal education as ideological training. Employing emerging interpretations of the Foucaultian concepts of the juridical and the disciplinary, it provides an analysis of the extent to which the expression ‘law as a academic discipline’ refers to more than a distinct body of substantive principles. In particular, it illustrates the extent to which legal education is a discursive practice constituted simultaneously by a substantive construct of juridical power and a catalogue of disciplinary legal methods. While conceding the pervasive ascription of disciplinary power within the overall institutional framework of higher education, this article examines the specifically disciplinary nature of the legal method’. It is submitted that legal education's emphasis upon superficially objective and technical skills permits the perpetuation of juridical legal rhetoric through the ascription of methodological dictates. These methodological dictates discipline the mind of the law student into conformity with the official rhetoric of authority and impartiality that are the characteristic traits of the juridical syntax.
法学:法学与法学交叉的法学教育
本文试图超越作为意识形态训练的法律教育的预先存在的批评。采用对福柯的司法和纪律概念的新兴解释,它提供了对“作为一门学术纪律的法律”这一表达在多大程度上指的不仅仅是一组独特的实质性原则的分析。特别是,它说明了法律教育在多大程度上是一种话语实践,同时由司法权的实体结构和纪律法律方法的目录构成。虽然承认在高等教育的整体制度框架内普遍存在纪律权力的归属,但本文考察了法律方法的具体纪律性质。有人认为,法律教育强调表面上的客观和技术技能,使得通过将方法规定归因而使司法法律修辞永久化。这些方法上的指令规范了法律学生的思想,使其与权威和公正的官方修辞相一致,这些修辞是司法句法的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信