The dynamics of transnational research collaboration illustrated by a project on social media in poverty reduction

Barbara Waldis, D. Duff
{"title":"The dynamics of transnational research collaboration illustrated by a project on social media in poverty reduction","authors":"Barbara Waldis, D. Duff","doi":"10.1080/21931674.2017.1314613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Transnational social work usually deals with the international collaboration to solve a specific problem or case, where the representation of the individual and institutional scope of life and action – from the perspective of the beneficiaries and the social workers – are considered as transnational and thus, not nationally bound. That is where the methodological nationalism is consciously ruled out. International research collaboration in social work considers the transnational space. What does it mean to build up a common, transnational understanding of specific, socially, politically, and theoretically anchored concepts of poverty and new media in poverty alleviation programs within the international research group? When, how, and with what limits is a comparison of governmental action programs possible? Where are the opportunities and the limits of such transnational research collaborations? The research teams from Ghana, Mauritius, and Switzerland were composed of six people: two experienced researchers, two lecturers, and two professionals in social work. The scope of this article is the analysis of where the benefits and the challenges for transnational conception of poverty reduction through new media and transnational research collaboration lies.","PeriodicalId":413830,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Social Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Social Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2017.1314613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Transnational social work usually deals with the international collaboration to solve a specific problem or case, where the representation of the individual and institutional scope of life and action – from the perspective of the beneficiaries and the social workers – are considered as transnational and thus, not nationally bound. That is where the methodological nationalism is consciously ruled out. International research collaboration in social work considers the transnational space. What does it mean to build up a common, transnational understanding of specific, socially, politically, and theoretically anchored concepts of poverty and new media in poverty alleviation programs within the international research group? When, how, and with what limits is a comparison of governmental action programs possible? Where are the opportunities and the limits of such transnational research collaborations? The research teams from Ghana, Mauritius, and Switzerland were composed of six people: two experienced researchers, two lecturers, and two professionals in social work. The scope of this article is the analysis of where the benefits and the challenges for transnational conception of poverty reduction through new media and transnational research collaboration lies.
一个关于社会媒体在减贫中的作用的项目说明了跨国研究合作的动态
跨国社会工作通常涉及解决特定问题或案例的国际合作,其中个人和机构的生活和行动范围的代表-从受益者和社会工作者的角度-被认为是跨国的,因此,不受国家约束。这就是方法论民族主义被有意识地排除在外的地方。国际社会工作研究合作考虑了跨国空间。在国际研究小组中,对具体的、社会的、政治的和理论上锚定的贫困和新媒体概念建立共同的、跨国的理解,在扶贫项目中意味着什么?什么时候、如何以及在何种限制下对政府行动方案进行比较是可能的?这种跨国研究合作的机会和限制在哪里?来自加纳、毛里求斯和瑞士的研究小组由六人组成:两名经验丰富的研究人员、两名讲师和两名社会工作专业人员。本文的范围是分析通过新媒体和跨国研究合作的跨国减贫概念的好处和挑战在哪里。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信