black[LSCDiscovery shared task] DeepMistake at LSCDiscovery: Can a Multilingual Word-in-Context Model Replace Human Annotators?

Daniil Homskiy, N. Arefyev
{"title":"black[LSCDiscovery shared task] \n DeepMistake at LSCDiscovery: Can a Multilingual Word-in-Context Model Replace Human Annotators?","authors":"Daniil Homskiy, N. Arefyev","doi":"10.18653/v1/2022.lchange-1.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we describe our solution of the LSCDiscovery shared task on Lexical Semantic Change Discovery (LSCD) in Spanish. Our solution employs a Word-in-Context (WiC) model, which is trained to determine if a particular word has the same meaning in two given contexts. We basically try to replicate the annotation of the dataset for the shared task, but replacing human annotators with a neural network. In the graded change discovery subtask, our solution has achieved the 2nd best result according to all metrics. In the main binary change detection subtask, our F1-score is 0.655 compared to 0.716 of the best submission, corresponding to the 5th place. However, in the optional sense gain detection subtask we have outperformed all other participants. During the post-evaluation experiments we compared different ways to prepare WiC data in Spanish for fine-tuning. We have found that it helps leaving only examples annotated as 1 (unrelated senses) and 4 (identical senses) rather than using 2x more examples including intermediate annotations.","PeriodicalId":120650,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change","volume":"868 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.lchange-1.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we describe our solution of the LSCDiscovery shared task on Lexical Semantic Change Discovery (LSCD) in Spanish. Our solution employs a Word-in-Context (WiC) model, which is trained to determine if a particular word has the same meaning in two given contexts. We basically try to replicate the annotation of the dataset for the shared task, but replacing human annotators with a neural network. In the graded change discovery subtask, our solution has achieved the 2nd best result according to all metrics. In the main binary change detection subtask, our F1-score is 0.655 compared to 0.716 of the best submission, corresponding to the 5th place. However, in the optional sense gain detection subtask we have outperformed all other participants. During the post-evaluation experiments we compared different ways to prepare WiC data in Spanish for fine-tuning. We have found that it helps leaving only examples annotated as 1 (unrelated senses) and 4 (identical senses) rather than using 2x more examples including intermediate annotations.
[LSCDiscovery共享任务]DeepMistake at LSCDiscovery:多语言上下文词模型能否取代人类注释器?
本文描述了西班牙语词汇语义变化发现(Lexical Semantic Change Discovery, LSCD)共享任务的解决方案。我们的解决方案采用上下文词(word -in- context, WiC)模型,该模型经过训练以确定特定单词在两个给定上下文中是否具有相同的含义。我们基本上尝试为共享任务复制数据集的注释,但用神经网络代替人类注释者。在分级变更发现子任务中,根据所有指标,我们的解决方案获得了第二好的结果。在主要的二进制变化检测子任务中,我们的f1得分是0.655,而最好的提交是0.716,对应第5名。然而,在可选的感知增益检测子任务中,我们的表现优于所有其他参与者。在评估后的实验中,我们比较了准备西班牙语WiC数据的不同方法,以便进行微调。我们发现,只将示例注释为1(不相关的意义)和4(相同的意义),而不是使用包含中间注释的2倍以上的示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信