Reliability and validity of revised scale -the Coping Strategies Scale after COVID-19 based on SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 22.0

Ting Wang, Xingyu Liu, Ruochen Wang, Xinyi Pan, Fengming Zhang
{"title":"Reliability and validity of revised scale -the Coping Strategies Scale after COVID-19 based on SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 22.0","authors":"Ting Wang, Xingyu Liu, Ruochen Wang, Xinyi Pan, Fengming Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICEKIM52309.2021.00205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A cross-section research was conducted on 1969 participants in February 2020 who were randomly selected from public in China. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of revised scale-the Coping Strategies Scale after COVID-19 (CSSC) by using the sample of 420 Chinese from the research. The purpose of the questionnaire revision was to measure people's coping strategies under the threat of COVID-19. Exploratory factor analyses were performed on 200 participants, and confirmatory factor analysis were on 220 participants. SPSS version 18.0 and AMOS 22.0 were used to analyze the data. Regarding the reliability of the scale, internal consistency revealed acceptable coefficient. The T -test was also used to examine the discrimination of the items. The exploratory factor analysis revealed that the scale was suitable for the application of factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis via Amos 22.0 was distinguished three dimensions for CSSC: distract, maintain, and escape (GFI=.96; AGFI=.93; RMR=.07; TLI=.95; NFI=.90; RMSEA=.05). The Cronbach's coefficient of the total scale was.79. The revised CSSC shows appropriate structural validity and relatively appropriate reliability, which can be used to measure coping strategies.","PeriodicalId":337654,"journal":{"name":"2021 2nd International Conference on Education, Knowledge and Information Management (ICEKIM)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 2nd International Conference on Education, Knowledge and Information Management (ICEKIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEKIM52309.2021.00205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A cross-section research was conducted on 1969 participants in February 2020 who were randomly selected from public in China. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of revised scale-the Coping Strategies Scale after COVID-19 (CSSC) by using the sample of 420 Chinese from the research. The purpose of the questionnaire revision was to measure people's coping strategies under the threat of COVID-19. Exploratory factor analyses were performed on 200 participants, and confirmatory factor analysis were on 220 participants. SPSS version 18.0 and AMOS 22.0 were used to analyze the data. Regarding the reliability of the scale, internal consistency revealed acceptable coefficient. The T -test was also used to examine the discrimination of the items. The exploratory factor analysis revealed that the scale was suitable for the application of factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis via Amos 22.0 was distinguished three dimensions for CSSC: distract, maintain, and escape (GFI=.96; AGFI=.93; RMR=.07; TLI=.95; NFI=.90; RMSEA=.05). The Cronbach's coefficient of the total scale was.79. The revised CSSC shows appropriate structural validity and relatively appropriate reliability, which can be used to measure coping strategies.
基于SPSS 18.0和AMOS 22.0的新冠肺炎应对策略量表的信度和效度
本文于2020年2月在全国范围内随机抽取1969名参与者进行了横断面研究。本研究以420名研究对象为样本,对修订后的新冠肺炎应对策略量表(CSSC)进行信度和效度评估。问卷修订的目的是衡量人们在COVID-19威胁下的应对策略。对200名参与者进行探索性因素分析,对220名参与者进行验证性因素分析。采用SPSS 18.0和AMOS 22.0对数据进行分析。对于量表的信度,内部一致性显示可接受系数。采用T检验检验项目的辨别性。探索性因子分析表明,该量表适合因子分析的应用。通过Amos 22.0进行验证性因子分析,区分出CSSC的三个维度:分散、维持和逃避(GFI= 0.96;AGFI = iseq指数;RMR = 07;TLI = .95;NFI = .90;RMSEA = . 05)。总量表的Cronbach系数为。79。修订后的CSSC具有适当的结构效度和相对适当的信度,可以用来衡量应对策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信