446 Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on gynaecological oncology healthcare in the Netherlands: data from the prospective dutch gynaecological oncology audit

M. Algera, W. van Driel, B. Slangen, M. Wouters, R. Kruitwagen
{"title":"446 Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on gynaecological oncology healthcare in the Netherlands: data from the prospective dutch gynaecological oncology audit","authors":"M. Algera, W. van Driel, B. Slangen, M. Wouters, R. Kruitwagen","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2021-esgo.303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Background ∗ The COVID-19 pandemic caused drastic healthcare changes worldwide. To date, the impact of these pandemic-induced alterations in gynaecological oncology healthcare is unknown. We assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gynaecological oncology healthcare in the Netherlands by analysing data of the Dutch Gynaecological Oncology Audit (DGOA). Methodology All patients in The Netherlands undergoing surgery for ovarian, vulvar, endometrial or cervical cancer are registered in the DGOA since 2014. To evaluate whether the COVID-19 pandemic influenced care, we compared the following parameters that are available in the DGOA: surgical volume, time to first treatment (TTFT), length of hospital stay (LOHS), postoperative complications and 30-day mortality. Four periods were identified in 2020 based on incidence of COVID-19 infections in The Netherlands: 'Pre-COVID-19', 'First wave', 'Interim period' and 'Second wave'. Using descriptive statistics, results from 2020 were compared with the same four periods of 2018-2019 combined. Result(s)∗ A total of 12.447 surgical procedures were analysed. Analysing the four periods in 2020, compared to the average volumes of 2018-2019, the surgical volume for the four tumour types decreased during the first COVID-19 wave and interim period (figure 1). This was due to a decrease in surgical volume for cervical cancer only (17.2% in 2020), while volumes for ovarian, vulvar and endometrial cancer remaining stable. Moreover, during the interim period, only 51% of the expected cervical cancer procedures were performed. A significantly shorter median TTFT was observed in all four malignancies in 2020, compared to 2018-2019 (table 1). No differences in LOHS, postoperative complications and 30-day mortality were observed (table 1). Conclusion∗ The COVID-19 pandemic clearly impacted gynaecological oncology healthcare in The Netherlands. During the first COVID-19 wave, surgical volume for gynaecological oncological procedures dropped considerably, mainly due to a substantial drop in surgical volume for cervical cancer. This is probably caused by the temporary interruption of the population screening program. During the COVID-19 pandemic, waiting time to start therapy was shorter. The quality of perioperative healthcare was not negatively impacted by the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":253349,"journal":{"name":"Organization of gynaecological cancer care","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization of gynaecological cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-esgo.303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Background ∗ The COVID-19 pandemic caused drastic healthcare changes worldwide. To date, the impact of these pandemic-induced alterations in gynaecological oncology healthcare is unknown. We assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gynaecological oncology healthcare in the Netherlands by analysing data of the Dutch Gynaecological Oncology Audit (DGOA). Methodology All patients in The Netherlands undergoing surgery for ovarian, vulvar, endometrial or cervical cancer are registered in the DGOA since 2014. To evaluate whether the COVID-19 pandemic influenced care, we compared the following parameters that are available in the DGOA: surgical volume, time to first treatment (TTFT), length of hospital stay (LOHS), postoperative complications and 30-day mortality. Four periods were identified in 2020 based on incidence of COVID-19 infections in The Netherlands: 'Pre-COVID-19', 'First wave', 'Interim period' and 'Second wave'. Using descriptive statistics, results from 2020 were compared with the same four periods of 2018-2019 combined. Result(s)∗ A total of 12.447 surgical procedures were analysed. Analysing the four periods in 2020, compared to the average volumes of 2018-2019, the surgical volume for the four tumour types decreased during the first COVID-19 wave and interim period (figure 1). This was due to a decrease in surgical volume for cervical cancer only (17.2% in 2020), while volumes for ovarian, vulvar and endometrial cancer remaining stable. Moreover, during the interim period, only 51% of the expected cervical cancer procedures were performed. A significantly shorter median TTFT was observed in all four malignancies in 2020, compared to 2018-2019 (table 1). No differences in LOHS, postoperative complications and 30-day mortality were observed (table 1). Conclusion∗ The COVID-19 pandemic clearly impacted gynaecological oncology healthcare in The Netherlands. During the first COVID-19 wave, surgical volume for gynaecological oncological procedures dropped considerably, mainly due to a substantial drop in surgical volume for cervical cancer. This is probably caused by the temporary interruption of the population screening program. During the COVID-19 pandemic, waiting time to start therapy was shorter. The quality of perioperative healthcare was not negatively impacted by the pandemic.
COVID-19大流行对荷兰妇科肿瘤医疗保健的影响:来自荷兰妇科肿瘤前瞻性审计的数据
COVID-19大流行在全球范围内引起了巨大的医疗保健变化。迄今为止,这些流行病引起的改变对妇科肿瘤保健的影响尚不清楚。我们通过分析荷兰妇科肿瘤审计(DGOA)的数据,评估了COVID-19大流行对荷兰妇科肿瘤医疗保健的影响。自2014年以来,荷兰所有接受卵巢、外阴、子宫内膜或宫颈癌手术的患者都在DGOA登记。为了评估COVID-19大流行是否影响护理,我们比较了DGOA中可用的以下参数:手术量、首次治疗时间(TTFT)、住院时间(LOHS)、术后并发症和30天死亡率。根据荷兰2019冠状病毒病感染的发病率,2020年确定了四个时期:“前冠状病毒病”、“第一波”、“过渡时期”和“第二波”。利用描述性统计,将2020年的结果与2018-2019年的四个时期的总和进行了比较。结果(s) *共分析了12.447例手术。分析2020年的四个时期,与2018-2019年的平均值相比,这四种肿瘤类型的手术量在第一次COVID-19浪潮和过渡时期有所下降(图1)。这是由于仅宫颈癌的手术量减少(2020年为17.2%),而卵巢癌、外阴癌和子宫内膜癌的手术量保持稳定。此外,在此期间,预期的子宫颈癌手术只进行了51%。与2018-2019年相比,2020年所有四种恶性肿瘤的中位TTFT均显著缩短(表1)。LOHS、术后并发症和30天死亡率均无差异(表1)。结论* COVID-19大流行明显影响了荷兰的妇科肿瘤医疗保健。在第一次COVID-19浪潮期间,妇科肿瘤手术量大幅下降,主要原因是宫颈癌手术量大幅下降。这可能是由于人口筛查计划的暂时中断造成的。在COVID-19大流行期间,等待开始治疗的时间更短。围手术期保健的质量没有受到大流行的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信