Pengikatan Jaminan Kebendaan dalam Kontrak Pembiayaan Muḍārabah sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Debitur Wanprestasi (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 272/K/AG/2015 tentang Pembiayaan Mudharabah)

M. Y. Harahap
{"title":"Pengikatan Jaminan Kebendaan dalam Kontrak Pembiayaan Muḍārabah sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Debitur Wanprestasi (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 272/K/AG/2015 tentang Pembiayaan Mudharabah)","authors":"M. Y. Harahap","doi":"10.24090/mnh.v14i1.2999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The imposition of collateral in muḍārabah financing contracts is a separate issue for Islamic banks even though in principle Islamic banks are not required to ask for collateral, but in practice, collateral is one of the elements that must be met by business actors in muḍārabah financing contracts. When the collateral is not applied, problems often arise in the case of debtor default. The problem in this study is whether the imposition of collateral can be used as an effort to resolve debtor disputes in muḍārabah financing contracts. To answer the research question, the method used is a normative juridical research method where the law is not only seen as law in books but also the law in action with the statutory approach and case study approach, namely the decision of the Mahkamah Agung. The results of the study presented that binding guarantees in muḍārabah financing contracts can be used as anticipation to minimize the risk of loss based on article 39 of Law no. 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic Banking. When the business actor defaults, neglects, and breaches the contract in muḍārabah financing, the guarantee can be used as an effort to mitigate the settlement of muḍārabah financing disputes to pay off obligations to Islamic banks.","PeriodicalId":215937,"journal":{"name":"Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v14i1.2999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The imposition of collateral in muḍārabah financing contracts is a separate issue for Islamic banks even though in principle Islamic banks are not required to ask for collateral, but in practice, collateral is one of the elements that must be met by business actors in muḍārabah financing contracts. When the collateral is not applied, problems often arise in the case of debtor default. The problem in this study is whether the imposition of collateral can be used as an effort to resolve debtor disputes in muḍārabah financing contracts. To answer the research question, the method used is a normative juridical research method where the law is not only seen as law in books but also the law in action with the statutory approach and case study approach, namely the decision of the Mahkamah Agung. The results of the study presented that binding guarantees in muḍārabah financing contracts can be used as anticipation to minimize the risk of loss based on article 39 of Law no. 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic Banking. When the business actor defaults, neglects, and breaches the contract in muḍārabah financing, the guarantee can be used as an effort to mitigate the settlement of muḍārabah financing disputes to pay off obligations to Islamic banks.
融资担保合同中唯物主义的捆绑你ḍādflp)作为解决争端的努力分析借款人违约(272号最高法院判决Mudharabah融资的/ K / AG - 2015)
对伊斯兰银行来说,在muḍārabah融资合同中强制要求提供抵押品是另一个问题,尽管原则上伊斯兰银行不要求提供抵押品,但在实践中,抵押品是muḍārabah融资合同中商业行为者必须满足的要素之一。当抵押品不适用时,问题往往出现在债务人违约的情况下。本研究的问题是抵押物的施加是否可以作为解决muḍārabah融资合同中债务人纠纷的一种努力。为了回答研究问题,所使用的方法是一种规范的司法研究方法,其中法律不仅被视为书本上的法律,而且还被视为行动中的法律,采用成文法方法和案例研究方法,即Mahkamah Agung的决定。研究结果表明,muḍārabah融资合同中具有约束力的担保可以根据第39号法第39条作为减少损失风险的预期。2008年第21号关于伊斯兰银行的决议。当业务行为人在muḍārabah融资中违约、忽视和违反合同时,担保可以作为减轻muḍārabah融资纠纷解决的一种努力,以偿还对伊斯兰银行的义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信