Are We Really That Close Together? Tracing and Discussing Similarities and Differences between Greek Terrorist Groups Using Cluster Analysis

Ioanna K. Lekea, P. Karampelas
{"title":"Are We Really That Close Together? Tracing and Discussing Similarities and Differences between Greek Terrorist Groups Using Cluster Analysis","authors":"Ioanna K. Lekea, P. Karampelas","doi":"10.1109/EISIC.2017.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the similarities and differences in both ideology expressed and practices employed by two terrorist groups that operated in Greece between the years of 1975 and 2017: Revolutionary Organization 17 November and Conspiracy of Fire Nuclei. Within this line of thought, we will briefly provide an outline of the political and ideological framework of the groups on focus in an effort to place them within the general historical and political context. We will then focus on the justification and deployment of the terrorist operations as presented in the communiqués published, as well as other announcements and notes distributed in the Social Media by the members of those two terrorist groups. In this context, we elaborate on the tactics of the terrorist groups: their targets, the weapons used and the consequences suffered as a result of their actions are analyzed, in order to evaluate their ideological and - perhaps - ethical standing. To analyze the communiqués of both organizations, two different text mining clustering techniques were applied and the outcomes enabled us to run a comparison between the two terrorist groups and also to examine the possibility of related means, ideology and people behind their different name.","PeriodicalId":436947,"journal":{"name":"2017 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2017.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper discusses the similarities and differences in both ideology expressed and practices employed by two terrorist groups that operated in Greece between the years of 1975 and 2017: Revolutionary Organization 17 November and Conspiracy of Fire Nuclei. Within this line of thought, we will briefly provide an outline of the political and ideological framework of the groups on focus in an effort to place them within the general historical and political context. We will then focus on the justification and deployment of the terrorist operations as presented in the communiqués published, as well as other announcements and notes distributed in the Social Media by the members of those two terrorist groups. In this context, we elaborate on the tactics of the terrorist groups: their targets, the weapons used and the consequences suffered as a result of their actions are analyzed, in order to evaluate their ideological and - perhaps - ethical standing. To analyze the communiqués of both organizations, two different text mining clustering techniques were applied and the outcomes enabled us to run a comparison between the two terrorist groups and also to examine the possibility of related means, ideology and people behind their different name.
我们真的那么亲密吗?用聚类分析探讨希腊恐怖组织的异同
本文讨论了1975年至2017年间在希腊活动的两个恐怖组织(革命组织11月17日和火核阴谋)在意识形态表达和实践上的异同。在这条思路中,我们将简要地提供一个关于焦点团体的政治和意识形态框架的大纲,以便将它们置于一般的历史和政治背景中。然后,我们将重点讨论公布的公报以及这两个恐怖主义集团成员在社交媒体上发布的其他公告和说明中提出的恐怖主义行动的理由和部署。在这方面,我们详细说明了恐怖主义集团的策略:分析了它们的目标、使用的武器和它们的行动所造成的后果,以便评价它们在意识形态上的地位,也许还有道德上的地位。为了分析这两个组织的公报,应用了两种不同的文本挖掘聚类技术,结果使我们能够在两个恐怖组织之间进行比较,并检查其不同名称背后相关手段,意识形态和人员的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信