Minimax: an incentive-driven pricing scheme in the electricity retail market

K. Sedzro, M. Chuah, A. Lamadrid
{"title":"Minimax: an incentive-driven pricing scheme in the electricity retail market","authors":"K. Sedzro, M. Chuah, A. Lamadrid","doi":"10.1109/MSCPES.2015.7115400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reducing peak demand is critically important in smartgrid as a significant fraction of the electric grids capital and operational expenses is affected by the peak power demands. Time of Use (ToU) and Real Time Pricing (RTP) pricing schemes have been used by power system operators to incentivize cus- tomers to reduce their peak energy demands during peak hours. However, ToU only provides a weak incentive for customers and does not promote adoption at scale. Similarly, day-ahead Real- Time Pricing (RTP) scheme might create peaks in previoulsy off-peak periods and causes some ping-pong effect in next day prices. In this paper, we introduce a new incentive-driven scheme called Minimax which encourages customers to flatten their daily load profiles such that they can reduce their electricity bill and help lowering the aggregate peak power demands. Using two real life energy usage datasets, we show via simulations how the peak energy usage and load factor vary with different choices of parameter values we select for the Minimax scheme. In addition, we present our optimal scheduling policy which yields the minimum energy bill assuming a certain percentage of load demands is schedulable. Our results using energy usage data of 100 homes from the UMASS dataset show that customers can save 13-17% of their electricity bills if the Minimax scheme is used but only about 2-3% if RTP or TOU scheme is used. Furthermore, the power system operators see a 10% reduction in peak power demand if appropriate parameter values are used for the Minimax scheme while the peak demands increase by more than 70% using RTP or TOU schemes.","PeriodicalId":212582,"journal":{"name":"2015 Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems (MSCPES)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems (MSCPES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSCPES.2015.7115400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Reducing peak demand is critically important in smartgrid as a significant fraction of the electric grids capital and operational expenses is affected by the peak power demands. Time of Use (ToU) and Real Time Pricing (RTP) pricing schemes have been used by power system operators to incentivize cus- tomers to reduce their peak energy demands during peak hours. However, ToU only provides a weak incentive for customers and does not promote adoption at scale. Similarly, day-ahead Real- Time Pricing (RTP) scheme might create peaks in previoulsy off-peak periods and causes some ping-pong effect in next day prices. In this paper, we introduce a new incentive-driven scheme called Minimax which encourages customers to flatten their daily load profiles such that they can reduce their electricity bill and help lowering the aggregate peak power demands. Using two real life energy usage datasets, we show via simulations how the peak energy usage and load factor vary with different choices of parameter values we select for the Minimax scheme. In addition, we present our optimal scheduling policy which yields the minimum energy bill assuming a certain percentage of load demands is schedulable. Our results using energy usage data of 100 homes from the UMASS dataset show that customers can save 13-17% of their electricity bills if the Minimax scheme is used but only about 2-3% if RTP or TOU scheme is used. Furthermore, the power system operators see a 10% reduction in peak power demand if appropriate parameter values are used for the Minimax scheme while the peak demands increase by more than 70% using RTP or TOU schemes.
极小最大值:电力零售市场中一种激励驱动的定价方案
减少峰值需求对于智能电网至关重要,因为电网资本和运营费用的很大一部分受到峰值电力需求的影响。电力系统运营商采用分时电价(ToU)和实时电价(RTP)来激励用户在用电高峰时段减少用电需求。然而,分时电价仅为客户提供了微弱的激励,并没有促进大规模采用。类似地,日前实时定价(RTP)方案可能会在之前的非高峰时期创造高峰,并在第二天的价格中产生一些乒乓效应。在本文中,我们介绍了一种新的激励驱动方案,称为Minimax,它鼓励客户平坦他们的日常负荷概况,这样他们就可以减少他们的电费,并有助于降低峰值总电力需求。使用两个现实生活中的能源使用数据集,我们通过模拟显示了峰值能源使用和负载因子如何随着我们为Minimax方案选择的参数值的不同而变化。此外,我们还提出了在一定比例的负荷需求是可调度的情况下,产生最小能源费用的最优调度策略。我们使用来自UMASS数据集的100个家庭的能源使用数据的结果表明,如果使用Minimax方案,客户可以节省13-17%的电费,但如果使用RTP或TOU方案,则只能节省约2-3%。此外,如果在Minimax方案中使用适当的参数值,电力系统运营商将看到峰值电力需求减少10%,而使用RTP或TOU方案,峰值需求增加70%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信