Asset Integrity Control: Prioritization of Offshore Topside Flange Openings During Preventive Maintenance Shutdowns

R. Ratnayake
{"title":"Asset Integrity Control: Prioritization of Offshore Topside Flange Openings During Preventive Maintenance Shutdowns","authors":"R. Ratnayake","doi":"10.1115/omae2019-96576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Top side flange inspection on offshore production and process facilities (P&PFs) has been a challenging task, due to complex geometries, produced crude oil and gas quality changes over the production well’s maturity, as well as the stringent regulatory requirements that need to be followed to assure the anticipated integrity of the operating assets. The complex geometries hinder the use of non-destructive testing (NDT) testing approaches and necessitate shutting down the system or subsystem in order to disassemble the flange to perform close visual inspection (CVI). Using risk-based asset integrity (AI) assessment and control (RBAIA&C) approaches, it is possible to classify the flanges into different classes, according to probability of failure (PoF). The PoF is estimated by considering the last inspection date, past inspection data, findings from similar locations/systems in the same offshore facility, etc. Together with consequence of potential failures (CoF), it is possible to estimate the risk of a potential failure due to the loss of integrity of a selected flange. Although several flanges are qualified to be disassembled, based on RBAIA&C activities, it is not possible to take all of them off during a certain preventive maintenance (PM) shutdown. Currently, ad hoc approaches have been used to further prioritize the flanges that have been recommended for inspection during a PM shutdown, based on RBAIA&C activities. The aforementioned jeopardizes the integrity of flanges and subsequently the overall system, possibly leading to catastrophic accidents. This manuscript demonstrates a methodology for the systematic further prioritization of flanges that need routine CVI. The flange inspection related system analytics have been incorporated with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to make logical further prioritization with sufficient transparency. The approach has been demonstrated with an illustrative case study that has been chosen from an offshore P&PF. A sensitivity analysis has also been performed and is presented to demonstrate how to carry out trade-off evaluations between different factors in the flange prioritization in a PM shutdown.","PeriodicalId":314553,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Structures, Safety, and Reliability","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Structures, Safety, and Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-96576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Top side flange inspection on offshore production and process facilities (P&PFs) has been a challenging task, due to complex geometries, produced crude oil and gas quality changes over the production well’s maturity, as well as the stringent regulatory requirements that need to be followed to assure the anticipated integrity of the operating assets. The complex geometries hinder the use of non-destructive testing (NDT) testing approaches and necessitate shutting down the system or subsystem in order to disassemble the flange to perform close visual inspection (CVI). Using risk-based asset integrity (AI) assessment and control (RBAIA&C) approaches, it is possible to classify the flanges into different classes, according to probability of failure (PoF). The PoF is estimated by considering the last inspection date, past inspection data, findings from similar locations/systems in the same offshore facility, etc. Together with consequence of potential failures (CoF), it is possible to estimate the risk of a potential failure due to the loss of integrity of a selected flange. Although several flanges are qualified to be disassembled, based on RBAIA&C activities, it is not possible to take all of them off during a certain preventive maintenance (PM) shutdown. Currently, ad hoc approaches have been used to further prioritize the flanges that have been recommended for inspection during a PM shutdown, based on RBAIA&C activities. The aforementioned jeopardizes the integrity of flanges and subsequently the overall system, possibly leading to catastrophic accidents. This manuscript demonstrates a methodology for the systematic further prioritization of flanges that need routine CVI. The flange inspection related system analytics have been incorporated with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to make logical further prioritization with sufficient transparency. The approach has been demonstrated with an illustrative case study that has been chosen from an offshore P&PF. A sensitivity analysis has also been performed and is presented to demonstrate how to carry out trade-off evaluations between different factors in the flange prioritization in a PM shutdown.
资产完整性控制:预防性维修停工期间海上平台法兰开口的优先顺序
海上生产和处理设施(p&pf)的顶部法兰检查一直是一项具有挑战性的任务,因为其复杂的几何形状,随着生产井的成熟,所产原油和天然气的质量会发生变化,并且需要遵守严格的监管要求,以确保运营资产的预期完整性。复杂的几何形状阻碍了无损检测(NDT)方法的使用,并且需要关闭系统或子系统,以便拆卸法兰进行近距离目视检查(CVI)。使用基于风险的资产完整性(AI)评估和控制(RBAIA&C)方法,可以根据故障概率(PoF)将法兰分类为不同的类别。PoF是通过考虑最后一次检查日期、过去的检查数据、同一海上设施中类似位置/系统的发现等来估计的。与潜在失效后果(CoF)一起,可以估计由于所选法兰完整性丧失而导致的潜在失效风险。尽管根据RBAIA&C活动,有几个法兰可以拆卸,但不可能在某个预防性维护(PM)停机期间将所有法兰都拆卸下来。目前,基于RBAIA&C活动,已经使用了特别的方法来进一步优先考虑在PM停工期间建议检查的法兰。上述情况危及法兰的完整性,随后危及整个系统,可能导致灾难性事故。本文演示了一种方法,用于系统地进一步确定需要常规CVI的法兰的优先级。将法兰检测相关的系统分析与层次分析法(AHP)相结合,在充分透明的情况下进行逻辑上的进一步优先排序。该方法已通过海上P&PF的一个说明性案例研究进行了演示。还进行了灵敏度分析,并展示了如何在PM停机时法兰优先级的不同因素之间进行权衡评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信