Medical Resistance to Criticism of Intersex Activists: Operations on the Frontline of Credibility

J. Charlebois, Vincent Guillot
{"title":"Medical Resistance to Criticism of Intersex Activists: Operations on the Frontline of Credibility","authors":"J. Charlebois, Vincent Guillot","doi":"10.14361/9783839430200-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its establishment in the early 1990s the intersex movement has been attempting to enforce the respect for intersex children’s human right to physical integrity and self-determination, as well as the non-pathologization of intersexuality. However, this has met with strong resistance from the medical community which prefers to reject criticism as subjective and unfounded. Credibility is a central issue in this debate, but it is rarely openly addressed. If the medical profession puts so much store in the quality of its analysis, what happens if we take a closer look?","PeriodicalId":430889,"journal":{"name":"Normed Children","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Normed Children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839430200-019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since its establishment in the early 1990s the intersex movement has been attempting to enforce the respect for intersex children’s human right to physical integrity and self-determination, as well as the non-pathologization of intersexuality. However, this has met with strong resistance from the medical community which prefers to reject criticism as subjective and unfounded. Credibility is a central issue in this debate, but it is rarely openly addressed. If the medical profession puts so much store in the quality of its analysis, what happens if we take a closer look?
对双性人活动家批评的医学抵抗:信誉前线的行动
自20世纪90年代初成立以来,双性人运动一直试图加强对双性儿童身体完整和自决的人权的尊重,以及对双性人的非病态化。然而,这遭到了医学界的强烈抵制,他们更愿意将批评视为主观和毫无根据的。信誉是这场辩论的核心问题,但很少有人公开讨论。如果医学界如此重视其分析的质量,那么如果我们仔细观察会发生什么呢?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信