The effect of pulsed electric field (PEF) and ultrasoud (US) technologies on the extraction of phycopiliproteins from Arthrospira platensis

Amel Aouir, M. Amiali, Tanya Kirilova-Gachovska, A. Benchabane, A. Bitam
{"title":"The effect of pulsed electric field (PEF) and ultrasoud (US) technologies on the extraction of phycopiliproteins from Arthrospira platensis","authors":"Amel Aouir, M. Amiali, Tanya Kirilova-Gachovska, A. Benchabane, A. Bitam","doi":"10.1109/IHTC.2015.7238065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among innovative methods of cell disruption, pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment is widely used for disintegration of cells and extraction of intracellular components. The aim of our work was to study the effect of PEF intensity on the extraction of bioactifs component such as Phycobiliproteins from cyanobacterium microalgae Arthrospira platensis, native from the extreme south of Algeria country (Tamanrasset). Ultrasound (US) was also used for cell disintegration to compare with PEF. The algae was cultivated under controlled conditions in Zarrouk medium (ZM). The Algae was harvested and suspended in phosphate buffer (pH=7) then treated by PEF or US. The Algae was continuously treated by PEF at 38 kV/cm pulse intensity. The pulse duration and frequency were 232 μs and 158 Hz, respectively. The treatment chamber was co-field having treatment volume and gap between electrodes of 0.05 cm3 and 0.1 cm, respectively. The total treatment time was 0.03 s. Regarding the US treatment, the microalgae was subjected to 35 kHz frequency for a maximum of 90 min. The temperature treatment was maintained at 35°C using a cooling system. For both methods used in this study the yield extractions of phycobiliproteins were the same (0.15 mg/mL) with the exception that the purity of the product was higher in PEF than in the US treatment (0.5 compare to 0.44). The PEF and US treatment induced cell disintegration resulted in the release of intracellular matter into suspension. However, PEF was more efficient than US since even it gives the same amount of extractions but with higher purity at lower treatment time (0.03 s compared to 5400 s).","PeriodicalId":178502,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Canada International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC2015)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Canada International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC2015)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IHTC.2015.7238065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Among innovative methods of cell disruption, pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment is widely used for disintegration of cells and extraction of intracellular components. The aim of our work was to study the effect of PEF intensity on the extraction of bioactifs component such as Phycobiliproteins from cyanobacterium microalgae Arthrospira platensis, native from the extreme south of Algeria country (Tamanrasset). Ultrasound (US) was also used for cell disintegration to compare with PEF. The algae was cultivated under controlled conditions in Zarrouk medium (ZM). The Algae was harvested and suspended in phosphate buffer (pH=7) then treated by PEF or US. The Algae was continuously treated by PEF at 38 kV/cm pulse intensity. The pulse duration and frequency were 232 μs and 158 Hz, respectively. The treatment chamber was co-field having treatment volume and gap between electrodes of 0.05 cm3 and 0.1 cm, respectively. The total treatment time was 0.03 s. Regarding the US treatment, the microalgae was subjected to 35 kHz frequency for a maximum of 90 min. The temperature treatment was maintained at 35°C using a cooling system. For both methods used in this study the yield extractions of phycobiliproteins were the same (0.15 mg/mL) with the exception that the purity of the product was higher in PEF than in the US treatment (0.5 compare to 0.44). The PEF and US treatment induced cell disintegration resulted in the release of intracellular matter into suspension. However, PEF was more efficient than US since even it gives the same amount of extractions but with higher purity at lower treatment time (0.03 s compared to 5400 s).
脉冲电场(PEF)和超声(US)技术对platarthrospira phycopiliprotein提取的影响
在细胞破坏的创新方法中,脉冲电场(PEF)处理被广泛用于细胞分解和提取细胞内成分。本研究的目的是研究PEF强度对从阿尔及利亚最南部国家(Tamanrasset)原生的蓝藻微藻Arthrospira platensis中提取生物活性成分(如藻胆蛋白)的影响。超声(US)也用于细胞崩解与PEF比较。在Zarrouk培养基(ZM)的控制条件下培养藻类。将藻类收获,悬浮于pH=7的磷酸盐缓冲液中,然后用PEF或US处理。在38 kV/cm脉冲强度下,对海藻进行连续脉冲电场处理。脉冲持续时间为232 μs,频率为158 Hz。处理室为共场,处理容积为0.05 cm3,电极间隙为0.1 cm。总治疗时间为0.03 s。对于US处理,将微藻置于35 kHz频率下最多90分钟。使用冷却系统将处理温度保持在35°C。对于本研究中使用的两种方法,藻胆蛋白的提取率是相同的(0.15 mg/mL),除了PEF处理的产品纯度高于US处理(0.5比0.44)。PEF和US处理诱导细胞解体,导致细胞内物质释放到悬浮中。然而,PEF比US更有效,因为即使它在更短的处理时间内(0.03 s与5400 s相比)也能提供相同数量的萃取物,但纯度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信