Fracture Assessment of Flaws in Undermatching Welds

Daniil Vasilikis, T. Tkaczyk, A. Pépin
{"title":"Fracture Assessment of Flaws in Undermatching Welds","authors":"Daniil Vasilikis, T. Tkaczyk, A. Pépin","doi":"10.1115/omae2020-18747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The criticality of girth weld flaws in subsea pipelines, installed by methods introducing plastic strains such as reel-lay, is usually evaluated through an engineering critical assessment (ECA). Most ECA methodologies require weld overmatch for pipes subjected to plastic deformation. This, however, is not always achievable for corrosion resistant or even carbon steel pipelines. In this case, a material and geometry-specific ECA is often applied.\n However, this ECA approach necessitates many 3D finite-element (FE) fracture analyses to be performed. Therefore, the authors propose a simpler screening assessment, which requires undertaking only a limited number of 3D FE fracture analyses. If the significance of a weld undermatch is shown to be negligible then a material and geometry-specific FE-based ECA is deemed unnecessary. Instead, flaw acceptance criteria can be determined under the assumption of weld evenmatch using a material-specific analytical ECA.\n The work was undertaken to define and validate the screening assessment process. Subsequently, DNV-GL endorsed the proposed approach which has since been successfully applied on several projects allowing optimization of the project cost and schedule. This paper describes the screening assessment methodology and discusses its application range and limitations. The conclusions and recommendations from a validation program are also provided.","PeriodicalId":240325,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2020-18747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The criticality of girth weld flaws in subsea pipelines, installed by methods introducing plastic strains such as reel-lay, is usually evaluated through an engineering critical assessment (ECA). Most ECA methodologies require weld overmatch for pipes subjected to plastic deformation. This, however, is not always achievable for corrosion resistant or even carbon steel pipelines. In this case, a material and geometry-specific ECA is often applied. However, this ECA approach necessitates many 3D finite-element (FE) fracture analyses to be performed. Therefore, the authors propose a simpler screening assessment, which requires undertaking only a limited number of 3D FE fracture analyses. If the significance of a weld undermatch is shown to be negligible then a material and geometry-specific FE-based ECA is deemed unnecessary. Instead, flaw acceptance criteria can be determined under the assumption of weld evenmatch using a material-specific analytical ECA. The work was undertaken to define and validate the screening assessment process. Subsequently, DNV-GL endorsed the proposed approach which has since been successfully applied on several projects allowing optimization of the project cost and schedule. This paper describes the screening assessment methodology and discusses its application range and limitations. The conclusions and recommendations from a validation program are also provided.
欠匹配焊缝缺陷的断裂评定
采用引入塑性应变(如卷筒铺设)的方法安装的海底管道环焊缝缺陷的临界性通常通过工程临界评估(ECA)来评估。大多数ECA方法都要求塑性变形管道的焊缝超匹配。然而,对于耐腐蚀甚至碳钢管道来说,这并不总是可以实现的。在这种情况下,通常应用特定于材料和几何的ECA。然而,这种ECA方法需要进行许多三维有限元(FE)断裂分析。因此,作者提出了一种更简单的筛选评估方法,只需要进行有限数量的三维有限元骨折分析。如果焊缝不匹配的重要性被证明可以忽略不计,那么基于材料和几何特定fe的ECA就被认为是不必要的。相反,可以使用特定材料的分析ECA在焊缝均匀匹配的假设下确定缺陷接受标准。进行这项工作是为了确定和验证筛选评估过程。随后,DNV-GL认可了提议的方法,该方法已成功应用于多个项目,从而优化了项目成本和进度。本文介绍了筛选评价方法,并讨论了其适用范围和局限性。并给出了验证程序的结论和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信