Charlotte Danielson or National Board Certification: A Comparison and Contrasting of Two Major National Frameworks for Teaching.

Thomas Viviano
{"title":"Charlotte Danielson or National Board Certification: A Comparison and Contrasting of Two Major National Frameworks for Teaching.","authors":"Thomas Viviano","doi":"10.21061/JCTE.V27I2.563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pennsylvania is in the process of adopting a rubric using the framework of Charlotte Danielson with four levels of competency to include distinguished, proficient, needs improvement or progressing, and unsatisfactory. It is a lot more detailed and intricate than the current employee evaluation form from the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) which has assessment levels of unsatisfactory, satisfactory, and commendable. The current PDE evaluation form uses bulleted style descriptors along with check boxes for sources of evidence and a block for administrative comments on justification for evaluation. The Charlotte Danielson Framework Model that is currently being piloted in Pennsylvania is rather logorrheic in nature but the final assessment or evaluation can be narrowed down to a related totaled number depending on the value given each level of the rubric.","PeriodicalId":170496,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Career and Technical Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Career and Technical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/JCTE.V27I2.563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Pennsylvania is in the process of adopting a rubric using the framework of Charlotte Danielson with four levels of competency to include distinguished, proficient, needs improvement or progressing, and unsatisfactory. It is a lot more detailed and intricate than the current employee evaluation form from the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) which has assessment levels of unsatisfactory, satisfactory, and commendable. The current PDE evaluation form uses bulleted style descriptors along with check boxes for sources of evidence and a block for administrative comments on justification for evaluation. The Charlotte Danielson Framework Model that is currently being piloted in Pennsylvania is rather logorrheic in nature but the final assessment or evaluation can be narrowed down to a related totaled number depending on the value given each level of the rubric.
夏洛特·丹尼尔森或国家委员会认证:两大国家教学框架的比较与对比。
宾夕法尼亚州正在采用Charlotte Danielson的框架,将能力分为四个等级,包括杰出、精通、需要改进或进步和不满意。它比目前宾夕法尼亚州教育部(PDE)的员工评估表要详细和复杂得多,评估等级为不满意,满意和赞扬。当前的PDE评估表单使用项目符号风格的描述符,以及用于证据来源的复选框和用于评估理由的管理评论的块。目前在宾夕法尼亚州试行的夏洛特·丹尼尔森框架模型在本质上是相当修辞的,但最终的评估或评价可以缩小到一个相关的总数,这取决于每个等级的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信