Wilbur C. Rich, African American Perspectives on Political Science

F. Hayes
{"title":"Wilbur C. Rich, African American Perspectives on Political Science","authors":"F. Hayes","doi":"10.1086/JAAHV94N2P311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wilbur C. Rich, ed., African American Perspectives on Political Science. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2007. Pp. 456. Cloth $89.50. Paper $32.95. Conventional political science in the United States is a historical and social science discourse located predominantly among highly educated white men, and produced by such men for each other. The anthology under review purports to evaluate and contest black exclusion from this academic discipline. Yet, this would-be progressive undertaking is largely truncated because most of the volume's eighteen essays are written within the shadow of dominant white American political science scholarship, and they scarcely challenge the discipline's received assumptions, theories, and analytical approaches. In general, readers will not find in this text new ideas, concepts, theories, approaches, or even new thinking about \"political thought.\" Rather, this is a set of essays whose authors essentially bow to the intellectual altars of liberal pluralism and political behavioralism. Rather than challenge or go beyond the limitations of scientism in conventional political studies, most of the authors embrace the \"scientific method\" of quantitative data analysis associated with the natural sciences as the model for empirical political science. Hence, little new knowledge about black politics emerges in this text. Written within the disciplinary power of behavioral political science, this volume is not a product of the provocative or powerful thinking necessary for the 21st century. Indeed, most of the essays easily could have been published ten or more years ago! The volume's title encourages the anticipation of particular viewpoints on the discipline of political science, specifically African American perspectives. Hence, part of my strategy in approaching the volume was to identify and understand the meaning of these various perspectives. I searched in vain. In the introduction the editor Wilbur Rich announces, \"This collection of essays is about political science as seen through the eyes of African American political scientists--their assessment of the subfields, their views about the quality of race-related research and their regrets about the omissions in the literature. The central theme is that race matters in politics not only nationally, but internationally.\" He notes that these \"omissions\" hinder an understanding of racial and ethnic conflict, and therefore require a variety of perspectives to contend with the \"danger of unconscious insularity in methodology and outlook.\" \"For this reason,\" Rich writes, \"we African American political scientists have a special responsibility to rethink the norms, canons, and directions of the discipline.\" Except for a few essays, however, the anthology falls far short of these goals. Indeed, the essays rarely break new ground, and the contributors generally accept the dominant methodology, norms, and canons of conventional political science. African American Perspectives on Political Science is comprised of five parts. Part one \"Race and Political Scientists\" contains three essays that are contextual and review the literature on conventional political science research, suggesting that the discipline has consistently evaded racial and ethnic politics. The contributors also note the challenges black political scientists face in seeking to advance in the field. There are two essays in \"Globalization and Transnational Politics.\" One provides a comparative analysis of African Americans in Latin American politics, and the other examines competing theoretical frameworks employed in the study of social change and political development. In \"Civic Engagement and Voting,\" part three, the four essays are interesting and analyze the complexity of black public opinion; the changing character of political attitudes about black feminism; the interconnections of race, class, and gender in the organizational politics and civic activities of African American women; and the academic trajectory and political activism of a member of the first generation of African Americans to earn the Ph. …","PeriodicalId":253318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African American History","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African American History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/JAAHV94N2P311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wilbur C. Rich, ed., African American Perspectives on Political Science. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2007. Pp. 456. Cloth $89.50. Paper $32.95. Conventional political science in the United States is a historical and social science discourse located predominantly among highly educated white men, and produced by such men for each other. The anthology under review purports to evaluate and contest black exclusion from this academic discipline. Yet, this would-be progressive undertaking is largely truncated because most of the volume's eighteen essays are written within the shadow of dominant white American political science scholarship, and they scarcely challenge the discipline's received assumptions, theories, and analytical approaches. In general, readers will not find in this text new ideas, concepts, theories, approaches, or even new thinking about "political thought." Rather, this is a set of essays whose authors essentially bow to the intellectual altars of liberal pluralism and political behavioralism. Rather than challenge or go beyond the limitations of scientism in conventional political studies, most of the authors embrace the "scientific method" of quantitative data analysis associated with the natural sciences as the model for empirical political science. Hence, little new knowledge about black politics emerges in this text. Written within the disciplinary power of behavioral political science, this volume is not a product of the provocative or powerful thinking necessary for the 21st century. Indeed, most of the essays easily could have been published ten or more years ago! The volume's title encourages the anticipation of particular viewpoints on the discipline of political science, specifically African American perspectives. Hence, part of my strategy in approaching the volume was to identify and understand the meaning of these various perspectives. I searched in vain. In the introduction the editor Wilbur Rich announces, "This collection of essays is about political science as seen through the eyes of African American political scientists--their assessment of the subfields, their views about the quality of race-related research and their regrets about the omissions in the literature. The central theme is that race matters in politics not only nationally, but internationally." He notes that these "omissions" hinder an understanding of racial and ethnic conflict, and therefore require a variety of perspectives to contend with the "danger of unconscious insularity in methodology and outlook." "For this reason," Rich writes, "we African American political scientists have a special responsibility to rethink the norms, canons, and directions of the discipline." Except for a few essays, however, the anthology falls far short of these goals. Indeed, the essays rarely break new ground, and the contributors generally accept the dominant methodology, norms, and canons of conventional political science. African American Perspectives on Political Science is comprised of five parts. Part one "Race and Political Scientists" contains three essays that are contextual and review the literature on conventional political science research, suggesting that the discipline has consistently evaded racial and ethnic politics. The contributors also note the challenges black political scientists face in seeking to advance in the field. There are two essays in "Globalization and Transnational Politics." One provides a comparative analysis of African Americans in Latin American politics, and the other examines competing theoretical frameworks employed in the study of social change and political development. In "Civic Engagement and Voting," part three, the four essays are interesting and analyze the complexity of black public opinion; the changing character of political attitudes about black feminism; the interconnections of race, class, and gender in the organizational politics and civic activities of African American women; and the academic trajectory and political activism of a member of the first generation of African Americans to earn the Ph. …
威尔伯·c·里奇:《非裔美国人的政治学观点》
威尔伯·c·里奇主编,《非裔美国人对政治学的看法》。费城:天普大学出版社,2007。456页。布89.50美元。论文32.95美元。在美国,传统的政治科学是一种历史和社会科学话语,主要集中在受过高等教育的白人男性中,由这些男性为彼此创造。正在审查的选集旨在评估和反对黑人被排除在这一学科之外。然而,这本自成进步的著作在很大程度上被删减了,因为这本书的18篇文章大多是在占主导地位的美国白人政治科学学术的阴影下写成的,它们几乎没有挑战该学科公认的假设、理论和分析方法。一般来说,读者不会在这篇文章中找到新的想法,概念,理论,方法,甚至是关于“政治思想”的新思维。更确切地说,这是一组文章,其作者基本上向自由多元主义和政治行为主义的知识祭坛低头。大多数作者并没有挑战或超越传统政治研究中科学主义的局限性,而是采用与自然科学相关的定量数据分析的“科学方法”作为实证政治科学的模型。因此,关于黑人政治的新知识很少出现在这篇文章中。在行为政治学的学科力量范围内写作,这本书不是21世纪所必需的挑衅性或强大思想的产物。事实上,大多数文章都可以在十年前或更早的时候发表!卷的标题鼓励对政治科学学科的特定观点的预期,特别是非洲裔美国人的观点。因此,我的部分策略是识别和理解这些不同视角的含义。我徒劳地寻找着。在前言中,编辑威尔伯·里奇(Wilbur Rich)宣布:“这本论文集是通过非裔美国政治科学家的眼睛看待政治学的——他们对子领域的评估,他们对种族相关研究质量的看法,以及他们对文献中遗漏的遗憾。”中心主题是种族问题不仅在国内政治中很重要,而且在国际上也很重要。”他指出,这些“遗漏”阻碍了对种族和民族冲突的理解,因此需要各种各样的观点来应对“方法论和观点上无意识的狭隘的危险”。“出于这个原因,”里奇写道,“我们非裔美国政治学家有一种特殊的责任,去重新思考这门学科的规范、准则和方向。”然而,除了几篇散文外,这本选集远远达不到这些目标。事实上,这些文章很少有新的突破,而且作者普遍接受传统政治学的主流方法论、规范和规范。《非裔美国人的政治学观点》由五个部分组成。第一部分“种族与政治科学家”包含三篇背景文章,回顾了传统政治学研究的文献,表明该学科一直回避种族和民族政治。作者还注意到黑人政治科学家在寻求在该领域取得进步时所面临的挑战。《全球化与跨国政治》有两篇论文。其中一篇对拉丁美洲政治中的非裔美国人进行了比较分析,另一篇则考察了在社会变革和政治发展研究中使用的相互竞争的理论框架。在第三部分“公民参与和投票”中,四篇文章很有趣,分析了黑人公众舆论的复杂性;黑人女权主义政治态度的变化特征非裔美国妇女组织政治和公民活动中种族、阶级和性别的相互联系;以及第一代获得博士学位的非裔美国人的学术轨迹和政治活动. ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信