Use-case-specific metrics for comparative testing of endpoint security products

Jeffrey Wu, A. Arrott
{"title":"Use-case-specific metrics for comparative testing of endpoint security products","authors":"Jeffrey Wu, A. Arrott","doi":"10.1109/MALWARE.2013.6703683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A battery of protection and resource performance tests were conducted using commercial internet security suites designed for general purpose usage with a Windows 8 personal computer (PC). Six classes of PC users were identified: Internet addict; network businessman; socializer; basic user; gamer; self-presenter; infrequent user. Recognizing that practical Internet security is different for each of these user groups, the importance of each component protection and resource performance test was assessed independently for each PC user group. By weighting component results to match relative importance for each user group, separate overall comparative assessments of the tested internet security suite products were obtained separately for each user group. From this, a more effective assessment of the value of commercial anti-malware protection is obtained specific to a customer's PC usage. When third party commercial anti-malware products were compared to the protection application provided by Microsoft, the average improvement ranged from 5% to 10% when measured separately for each PC user group.","PeriodicalId":325281,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software: \"The Americas\" (MALWARE)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software: \"The Americas\" (MALWARE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MALWARE.2013.6703683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A battery of protection and resource performance tests were conducted using commercial internet security suites designed for general purpose usage with a Windows 8 personal computer (PC). Six classes of PC users were identified: Internet addict; network businessman; socializer; basic user; gamer; self-presenter; infrequent user. Recognizing that practical Internet security is different for each of these user groups, the importance of each component protection and resource performance test was assessed independently for each PC user group. By weighting component results to match relative importance for each user group, separate overall comparative assessments of the tested internet security suite products were obtained separately for each user group. From this, a more effective assessment of the value of commercial anti-malware protection is obtained specific to a customer's PC usage. When third party commercial anti-malware products were compared to the protection application provided by Microsoft, the average improvement ranged from 5% to 10% when measured separately for each PC user group.
用于端点安全产品比较测试的特定于用例的度量
使用为Windows 8个人计算机设计的通用商业互联网安全套件进行了一系列保护和资源性能测试。电脑用户分为六类:网络成瘾者;网络商人;社交的;基本的用户;玩家;self-presenter;罕见的用户。认识到实际的互联网安全对每个用户组都是不同的,每个组件保护和资源性能测试的重要性对每个PC用户组进行了独立评估。通过加权组件结果以匹配每个用户组的相对重要性,分别为每个用户组获得测试的互联网安全套件产品的单独总体比较评估。由此,可以更有效地评估商业反恶意软件保护的价值,具体到客户的PC使用情况。当将第三方商业反恶意软件产品与微软提供的保护应用程序进行比较时,分别对每个PC用户组进行测量时,平均改进幅度在5%到10%之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信