Comparison of heparin-immobilized vs. antibody-immobilized microspheres for the capture and detection of cytokines during microdialysis sampling

J. Duo, Randy F. Espinal Cabrera, J. Stenken
{"title":"Comparison of heparin-immobilized vs. antibody-immobilized microspheres for the capture and detection of cytokines during microdialysis sampling","authors":"J. Duo, Randy F. Espinal Cabrera, J. Stenken","doi":"10.1109/LISSA.2009.4906722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heparin-immobilized beads were compared against antibody-immobilized beads for improving the collection of targeted cytokines through microdialysis sampling probes. Heparin offers an advantage over antibodies with respect to its stability and cost. The cytokines, MCP-1 and RANTES, exhibited increased flux through the probes when either heparin-immobilized or antibody-immobilized beads were included in the perfusion fluid. This suggests that heparin-immobilized beads may be a viable alternative to antibody-immobilized beads to increase the flux of select cytokines during microdialysis sampling.","PeriodicalId":285171,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE/NIH Life Science Systems and Applications Workshop","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE/NIH Life Science Systems and Applications Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LISSA.2009.4906722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Heparin-immobilized beads were compared against antibody-immobilized beads for improving the collection of targeted cytokines through microdialysis sampling probes. Heparin offers an advantage over antibodies with respect to its stability and cost. The cytokines, MCP-1 and RANTES, exhibited increased flux through the probes when either heparin-immobilized or antibody-immobilized beads were included in the perfusion fluid. This suggests that heparin-immobilized beads may be a viable alternative to antibody-immobilized beads to increase the flux of select cytokines during microdialysis sampling.
肝素固定化微球与抗体固定化微球在微透析取样中捕获和检测细胞因子的比较
将肝素固定化微球与抗体固定化微球进行比较,以改善微透析取样探针对靶向细胞因子的收集。肝素在稳定性和成本方面比抗体有优势。当灌注液中加入肝素固定化或抗体固定化微球时,细胞因子MCP-1和RANTES通过探针的通量增加。这表明,肝素固定化微球可能是一种可行的替代抗体固定化微球,以增加微透析取样过程中选定细胞因子的通量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信