Raiffeisen Bank International AG V Croatia, ICSID Case No arb/17/34

J. Chaisse, A. Solanki
{"title":"Raiffeisen Bank International AG V Croatia, ICSID Case No arb/17/34","authors":"J. Chaisse, A. Solanki","doi":"10.1163/24689017_0601014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In September 2020, an ICSID tribunal rendered its decision on the Respondent’s Jurisdictional Objections in Raiffeisen v Croatia, two years after the ICSID Chairman of the Administrative Council rejected Croatia’s application to disqualify Dr. Stanimir Alexandrov as a member of the tribunal. The decision on the Respondent’s Jurisdictional Objections concerns the interpretation of the Austria- Croatia bit and its compatibility with the EU acquis. This case- note addresses both the decision on the Respondent’s Jurisdictional Objections and the Chairman of the Administrative Council’s decision on the proposed disqualification of Dr. Alexandrov. In so doing, it focuses on three key issues: the selection and conduct of the arbitrator that gave rise to disqualification, and the role played by ICSID in the process; the interrelation between investment treaties, EU Law, and EU Member States; and the implementation of the vclt for termination of treaties covering similar subject matter.","PeriodicalId":164842,"journal":{"name":"European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24689017_0601014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In September 2020, an ICSID tribunal rendered its decision on the Respondent’s Jurisdictional Objections in Raiffeisen v Croatia, two years after the ICSID Chairman of the Administrative Council rejected Croatia’s application to disqualify Dr. Stanimir Alexandrov as a member of the tribunal. The decision on the Respondent’s Jurisdictional Objections concerns the interpretation of the Austria- Croatia bit and its compatibility with the EU acquis. This case- note addresses both the decision on the Respondent’s Jurisdictional Objections and the Chairman of the Administrative Council’s decision on the proposed disqualification of Dr. Alexandrov. In so doing, it focuses on three key issues: the selection and conduct of the arbitrator that gave rise to disqualification, and the role played by ICSID in the process; the interrelation between investment treaties, EU Law, and EU Member States; and the implementation of the vclt for termination of treaties covering similar subject matter.
Raiffeisen Bank International AG诉Croatia, ICSID案件No . arb/17/34
2020年9月,在ICSID行政理事会主席驳回克罗地亚取消Stanimir Alexandrov博士作为该法庭成员资格的申请两年后,ICSID法庭就Raiffeisen诉克罗地亚案中被投诉人的管辖权异议作出了裁决。关于被投诉人管辖权异议的决定涉及对奥地利-克罗地亚条款的解释及其与欧盟惯例的兼容性。本案件说明涉及关于被投诉人管辖权异议的决定和行政委员会主席关于提议取消Alexandrov博士资格的决定。在此过程中,它侧重于三个关键问题:导致取消资格的仲裁员的选择和行为,以及ICSID在此过程中发挥的作用;投资条约、欧盟法和欧盟成员国之间的相互关系;以及执行关于终止涉及类似主题事项的条约的VCLT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信