Daniel A. Glaser-Segura, Suzanne Mudge, C. Bratianu, I. Jianu, Sorin Vâlcea
{"title":"Quality Improvement of Business Education in Romanian Universities: The Student as Customer and Client","authors":"Daniel A. Glaser-Segura, Suzanne Mudge, C. Bratianu, I. Jianu, Sorin Vâlcea","doi":"10.1080/03797720701840625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study frames the quality transition of Romanian business education embracing the role of students as clients and customers. In the first part of the study, responses from ninety‐four fourth‐year Romanian students provided a statistically significant gap between the level of importance of business competences and their level of preparation. The second part used content analysis to establish four major improvement themes: 1) new course specification; 2) pedagogical modification using practical applications; 3) course delivery improvement; and 4) university‐directed field experiences. The findings support the notion that Romanian students provide reliable and unique assessments of their education.","PeriodicalId":294207,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education in Europe","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720701840625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
This study frames the quality transition of Romanian business education embracing the role of students as clients and customers. In the first part of the study, responses from ninety‐four fourth‐year Romanian students provided a statistically significant gap between the level of importance of business competences and their level of preparation. The second part used content analysis to establish four major improvement themes: 1) new course specification; 2) pedagogical modification using practical applications; 3) course delivery improvement; and 4) university‐directed field experiences. The findings support the notion that Romanian students provide reliable and unique assessments of their education.