Punitive Damages for Corporations in China: Establishment and improvement

Shurun Lin
{"title":"Punitive Damages for Corporations in China: Establishment and improvement","authors":"Shurun Lin","doi":"10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Punitive damages are remedies for non-specific subjects like communities without specific rights suffering from illegal behaviors. Having the functions of compensation, punishment, and prevention, punitive damages are the necessary solution to the inherent deficiencies in current remedy system in China that both civil and public remedies can hardly cover the losses of communities. However, punitive damages are misunderstood theoretically and practically in China. Traditional critics like caseload of courts, lack of procedural protections, ineffectiveness in punishment and deterrence, and overlapping in functions cannot deny the necessity of establishing punitive damages. Meanwhile, punitive damages in Chinese legal system cannot fit in with their functions, comparing with legal practice in the US. This issue is mainly the result of the inadequate application conditions, narrow scope of factors, and single distribution of damages, which are also the issues to be resolved when reconstructing the punitive damages system. Based on legal analysis of positive law and judicial practice in both America and China, this article attempts to justify the necessity of punitive damages as well as putting forward some approaches to the reconstruction of punitive damages in China.","PeriodicalId":380947,"journal":{"name":"BCP Social Sciences & Humanities","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCP Social Sciences & Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Punitive damages are remedies for non-specific subjects like communities without specific rights suffering from illegal behaviors. Having the functions of compensation, punishment, and prevention, punitive damages are the necessary solution to the inherent deficiencies in current remedy system in China that both civil and public remedies can hardly cover the losses of communities. However, punitive damages are misunderstood theoretically and practically in China. Traditional critics like caseload of courts, lack of procedural protections, ineffectiveness in punishment and deterrence, and overlapping in functions cannot deny the necessity of establishing punitive damages. Meanwhile, punitive damages in Chinese legal system cannot fit in with their functions, comparing with legal practice in the US. This issue is mainly the result of the inadequate application conditions, narrow scope of factors, and single distribution of damages, which are also the issues to be resolved when reconstructing the punitive damages system. Based on legal analysis of positive law and judicial practice in both America and China, this article attempts to justify the necessity of punitive damages as well as putting forward some approaches to the reconstruction of punitive damages in China.
中国企业惩罚性赔偿制度的建立与完善
惩罚性赔偿是对没有特定权利的社区等非特定主体遭受违法行为的救济。惩罚性赔偿具有补偿、惩罚和预防功能,是中国现行救济制度中民事救济和公共救济难以弥补社区损失的内在缺陷的必要解决方案。然而,在中国,惩罚性赔偿在理论和实践上都存在误解。传统的批评,如法院案件过多、缺乏程序保护、惩罚和威慑无效、职能重叠等,都不能否认设立惩罚性赔偿的必要性。与此同时,与美国的法律实践相比,中国法律制度中的惩罚性赔偿制度与其功能还不相适应。造成这一问题的主要原因是适用条件不完善、构成要件范围狭窄、损害赔偿分配单一,这也是重构惩罚性赔偿制度需要解决的问题。本文试图通过对中美两国成文法和司法实践的法律分析,论证惩罚性赔偿制度的必要性,并提出中国惩罚性赔偿制度重构的一些思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信