Comparison of Indoor localization Methods in Two-Dimensional Wireless Sensor Network

Bixing Yan, B. Zhu, Huihe Chen, Yueqi Yang, Jianqiao Yang
{"title":"Comparison of Indoor localization Methods in Two-Dimensional Wireless Sensor Network","authors":"Bixing Yan, B. Zhu, Huihe Chen, Yueqi Yang, Jianqiao Yang","doi":"10.1109/CISCE50729.2020.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the boost demand of localization-based service, indoor positioning has been drawn on highly awareness. However, although there are already many solutions to deal with this problem, comparisons of them are still of great significance. This paper compares the precision and the robustness of traditional indoor localization methods in wireless sensor network (WSN). Exponential model is applied to analogy a 2.4GHz indoor channel. Based on different types of sensors, several specific algorithms, such as TOA, TDOA, Least Square Method, Triangular Localization, Centroid Localization and AOA are illustrated in a two-dimensional indoor model. In addition, these methods are compared under the same condition to get their respective results and errors. From the comparison of them, different methods are decided to use based on different kind of sensors. AOA and TDOA are chosen when sensors only can measure the angle and the time respectively. When the sensor can merely receive the signal strength, triangular localization method is the best way.","PeriodicalId":101777,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Communications, Information System and Computer Engineering (CISCE)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Communications, Information System and Computer Engineering (CISCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISCE50729.2020.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the boost demand of localization-based service, indoor positioning has been drawn on highly awareness. However, although there are already many solutions to deal with this problem, comparisons of them are still of great significance. This paper compares the precision and the robustness of traditional indoor localization methods in wireless sensor network (WSN). Exponential model is applied to analogy a 2.4GHz indoor channel. Based on different types of sensors, several specific algorithms, such as TOA, TDOA, Least Square Method, Triangular Localization, Centroid Localization and AOA are illustrated in a two-dimensional indoor model. In addition, these methods are compared under the same condition to get their respective results and errors. From the comparison of them, different methods are decided to use based on different kind of sensors. AOA and TDOA are chosen when sensors only can measure the angle and the time respectively. When the sensor can merely receive the signal strength, triangular localization method is the best way.
二维无线传感器网络室内定位方法的比较
随着定位服务需求的增长,室内定位已经引起了人们的高度重视。然而,虽然已经有很多解决这个问题的方法,但是对它们进行比较仍然很有意义。本文比较了无线传感器网络中传统室内定位方法的精度和鲁棒性。采用指数模型对2.4GHz室内信道进行了模拟。针对不同类型的传感器,给出了二维室内模型中TOA、TDOA、最小二乘法、三角形定位、质心定位和AOA等具体算法。并在相同条件下对这些方法进行了比较,得到了各自的结果和误差。通过比较,针对不同类型的传感器,决定采用不同的方法。当传感器只能分别测量角度和时间时,选择AOA和TDOA。当传感器只能接收到信号强度时,三角定位方法是最好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信