{"title":"Manoeuvre is Dead?","authors":"Amos C. Fox","doi":"10.1080/03071847.2022.2058601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the better part of the 20th century, manoeuvre held primacy in Western military thinking. Yet, modern technological advances, in today’s period of limited war, have suffocated the conditions and components that manoeuvre requires to exist. As a result, it is dead. Amos C Fox argues that, instead of lamenting this, the defence and security studies communities should celebrate manoeuvre’s death as a liberating event and begin looking at alternative theories and ideas for the prosecution of war.◼","PeriodicalId":221517,"journal":{"name":"The RUSI Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The RUSI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2022.2058601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For the better part of the 20th century, manoeuvre held primacy in Western military thinking. Yet, modern technological advances, in today’s period of limited war, have suffocated the conditions and components that manoeuvre requires to exist. As a result, it is dead. Amos C Fox argues that, instead of lamenting this, the defence and security studies communities should celebrate manoeuvre’s death as a liberating event and begin looking at alternative theories and ideas for the prosecution of war.◼
在20世纪的大部分时间里,机动在西方军事思想中占据了首要地位。然而,在今天的有限战争时期,现代技术的进步扼杀了机动存在所需的条件和要素。结果,它死了。阿莫斯·C·福克斯(Amos C . Fox)认为,国防和安全研究界不应为此感到悲哀,而应将演习之死视为一件解放的事件来庆祝,并开始寻找其他的理论和观点来起诉战争