Survey and overview of Mobile Ad-Hoc Network routing protocols

A. Srivastava, A. Mishra, Bikash Upadhyay, Akhileshwar Yadav
{"title":"Survey and overview of Mobile Ad-Hoc Network routing protocols","authors":"A. Srivastava, A. Mishra, Bikash Upadhyay, Akhileshwar Yadav","doi":"10.1109/ICAETR.2014.7012959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Early 1990 researchers have shown a keen interest in Mobile Ad-hoc Network. The absence of infrastructure and its dynamic, diverse principal characteristics has made it more popular as well as vibrant because of it the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is established. Not only bigger company and organization, different institutes are also working on MANET. It applies the TCP/IP protocol stack with slight modification for end to end communication. In MANET Routing is the toughest task because nodes works as router and host at the same time with the changing environment, infact for this many researchers have proposed new protocols and have shown that the protocol proposed works well and is improved over different scenario, strategy and conditions. In contrast to above it is quite challenging that which protocol performs best under different scenario, strategy and condition. Therefore, in this paper we provide a survey and overview of different routing protocols even survey of complexity comparison is also performed to find out which protocol will fit for larger network or so.","PeriodicalId":196504,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Advances in Engineering & Technology Research (ICAETR - 2014)","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Advances in Engineering & Technology Research (ICAETR - 2014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAETR.2014.7012959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

In Early 1990 researchers have shown a keen interest in Mobile Ad-hoc Network. The absence of infrastructure and its dynamic, diverse principal characteristics has made it more popular as well as vibrant because of it the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is established. Not only bigger company and organization, different institutes are also working on MANET. It applies the TCP/IP protocol stack with slight modification for end to end communication. In MANET Routing is the toughest task because nodes works as router and host at the same time with the changing environment, infact for this many researchers have proposed new protocols and have shown that the protocol proposed works well and is improved over different scenario, strategy and conditions. In contrast to above it is quite challenging that which protocol performs best under different scenario, strategy and condition. Therefore, in this paper we provide a survey and overview of different routing protocols even survey of complexity comparison is also performed to find out which protocol will fit for larger network or so.
移动Ad-Hoc网络路由协议综述
20世纪90年代初,研究人员对移动自组织网络表现出浓厚的兴趣。基础设施的缺乏及其动态的、多样化的主要特征使其更受欢迎和充满活力,因为它建立了互联网工程任务组(IETF)。不仅是大公司和组织,不同的研究所也在研究MANET。它应用TCP/IP协议栈,对端到端通信进行了轻微修改。在MANET中,路由是最困难的任务,因为节点在不断变化的环境中同时作为路由器和主机,因此许多研究人员提出了新的协议,并表明所提出的协议在不同的场景、策略和条件下都能很好地工作并得到改进。相比之下,在不同的场景、策略和条件下,哪种协议表现最好是一个相当具有挑战性的问题。因此,本文对不同的路由协议进行了调查和概述,甚至对复杂性进行了调查比较,以找出哪种协议适合更大的网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信