Wittgenstein and his Philosophy of First-Time Events

J. Shotter
{"title":"Wittgenstein and his Philosophy of First-Time Events","authors":"J. Shotter","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2007.9.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What might a disciplined inquiry into events occurring always for “another first time” (Garfinkel, 1967) look like? Whilst traditionally, we have always sought a hidden order behind appearances, this may be a misleading aim in human affairs. In this paper I argue that this is to begin our investigations too late in the day. It leads us to think of people as being already self-conscious, self-contained individuals, acting and speaking mostly in a wilful and intellectual manner. Indeed many have interpreted Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, and his claim that the meaning of a word is its use in the language, in this light: as if he was concerned with words used as tools or as making moves in a language-game according to pre-existing rules. In this view, words have meaning only if they are systematically connected with states of affairs and/or states of mind. There is, however, another side to Wittgenstein: a concern with the beginnings of language-games in our spontaneous bodily reactions, and with such reactions as being the prototypes for new ways of thinking rather than as the results of ones already in existence. Here, meaning is understood in terms of one’s direct and immediate responsiveness to one’s surroundings. This paper explores this side of Wittgenstein’s thought, and relates it both to his claim that many events in human affairs can be ‘explained’ simply by giving descriptions, and to outlining a set of practical methods for beginning new practices, practices that can begin by noticing the presence within our old practices of previously unnoticed spontaneous bodily reactions.","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"24 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2007.9.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

What might a disciplined inquiry into events occurring always for “another first time” (Garfinkel, 1967) look like? Whilst traditionally, we have always sought a hidden order behind appearances, this may be a misleading aim in human affairs. In this paper I argue that this is to begin our investigations too late in the day. It leads us to think of people as being already self-conscious, self-contained individuals, acting and speaking mostly in a wilful and intellectual manner. Indeed many have interpreted Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, and his claim that the meaning of a word is its use in the language, in this light: as if he was concerned with words used as tools or as making moves in a language-game according to pre-existing rules. In this view, words have meaning only if they are systematically connected with states of affairs and/or states of mind. There is, however, another side to Wittgenstein: a concern with the beginnings of language-games in our spontaneous bodily reactions, and with such reactions as being the prototypes for new ways of thinking rather than as the results of ones already in existence. Here, meaning is understood in terms of one’s direct and immediate responsiveness to one’s surroundings. This paper explores this side of Wittgenstein’s thought, and relates it both to his claim that many events in human affairs can be ‘explained’ simply by giving descriptions, and to outlining a set of practical methods for beginning new practices, practices that can begin by noticing the presence within our old practices of previously unnoticed spontaneous bodily reactions.
维特根斯坦和他的第一次事件哲学
对总是发生在“另一个第一次”(Garfinkel, 1967)的事件进行有纪律的调查,会是什么样子?虽然传统上,我们总是在表象背后寻找隐藏的秩序,但在人类事务中,这可能是一个误导性的目标。在本文中,我认为这是开始我们的调查太迟了。它使我们认为人已经是有自我意识的、独立的个体,以一种任性和理智的方式行事和说话。的确,许多人从这个角度来解释维特根斯坦后来的哲学,以及他关于单词的意义是它在语言中的用法的主张:就好像他关心的是作为工具使用的单词,或者是根据预先存在的规则在语言游戏中做出动作。在这种观点中,词语只有在系统地与事态和/或精神状态联系在一起时才有意义。然而,维特根斯坦还有另一个方面:他关注的是语言游戏在我们自发的身体反应中的开始,以及这些反应是新思维方式的原型,而不是已经存在的结果。在这里,意义是根据一个人对周围环境的直接反应来理解的。本文探讨了维特根斯坦思想的这一方面,并将其与他的主张联系起来,即人类事务中的许多事件可以通过简单的描述来“解释”,并概述了一套开始新实践的实用方法,这些实践可以通过注意我们以前未注意到的自发身体反应的存在而开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信