A History of the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee and its Predecessors

I. Ramsay
{"title":"A History of the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee and its Predecessors","authors":"I. Ramsay","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3267685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From 1983 until the abolition of the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee (CAMAC) in 2018, there existed an independent body to provide advice to the Australian government on matters of corporate law reform. The abolition of CAMAC was controversial. The purpose of this paper is to provide a history of CAMAC and its predecessors. These law reform bodies published many reports and their influence on corporate law reform has been significant. Yet no one has yet provided a history. A key part of the paper is consideration of the debates leading up to abolition of CAMAC. An examination of these debates demonstrates how the government made this decision in the face of very strong opposition from organisations representing business, shareholders and various professions including the Australian Institute of Company Directors, the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors, the Governance Institute of Australia, the Law Council of Australia, the two major accounting bodies, the Australian Restructuring Insolvency & Turnaround Association and the Corporate Law Teachers Association. In the opinion of the author, the decision to abolish CAMAC has resulted in a weakened law reform process.","PeriodicalId":343950,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: International/Non-US eJournal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: International/Non-US eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3267685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From 1983 until the abolition of the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee (CAMAC) in 2018, there existed an independent body to provide advice to the Australian government on matters of corporate law reform. The abolition of CAMAC was controversial. The purpose of this paper is to provide a history of CAMAC and its predecessors. These law reform bodies published many reports and their influence on corporate law reform has been significant. Yet no one has yet provided a history. A key part of the paper is consideration of the debates leading up to abolition of CAMAC. An examination of these debates demonstrates how the government made this decision in the face of very strong opposition from organisations representing business, shareholders and various professions including the Australian Institute of Company Directors, the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors, the Governance Institute of Australia, the Law Council of Australia, the two major accounting bodies, the Australian Restructuring Insolvency & Turnaround Association and the Corporate Law Teachers Association. In the opinion of the author, the decision to abolish CAMAC has resulted in a weakened law reform process.
企业及市场谘询委员会及其前身的历史
从1983年到2018年公司和市场咨询委员会(CAMAC)被废除,一直存在一个独立机构,就公司法改革事宜向澳大利亚政府提供建议。取消CAMAC是有争议的。本文的目的是提供CAMAC及其前身的历史。这些法律改革机构发表了许多报告,对公司法改革产生了重大影响。然而,至今还没有人提供这段历史。本文的一个关键部分是对导致取消CAMAC的辩论的考虑。对这些辩论的研究表明,政府是如何在企业、股东和各种专业组织的强烈反对下做出这一决定的,这些组织包括澳大利亚公司董事协会、澳大利亚退休金投资者委员会、澳大利亚治理研究所、澳大利亚法律委员会、两大会计机构、澳大利亚重组、破产和周转协会和公司法教师协会。在作者看来,废除CAMAC的决定削弱了法律改革进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信