Claims on Sri Lankan Food Labels: A Comparative Legal Analysis with Selected Jurisdictions

Charith Amidha Hettiarachch, J. Wardle, M. Arnold, Niroshika Liyana Muhandiram
{"title":"Claims on Sri Lankan Food Labels: A Comparative Legal Analysis with Selected Jurisdictions","authors":"Charith Amidha Hettiarachch, J. Wardle, M. Arnold, Niroshika Liyana Muhandiram","doi":"10.4038/OUSLJ.V15I2.7484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Claims on labels are one of major marketing strategies in the food industry. Health of consumers may be affected by inaccurate and misleading claims and therefore, such claims need to be regulated by state legislation. The Food (Labelling and Advertising) Regulations, 2005 made under the Food Act of 1980 is the main law governing food labelling claims in Sri Lanka. This study is a desk review which analyses the relevant regulations in the Food (Labelling and Advertising) Regulations, 2005. The study further critiques the existing regulations and compares with international standards (Codex Alimentarius) and regulations in developed countries such as Australia which have a broad local and international food market with modern technology. The objective of the study is to identify the scope of the ‘claim’ and its current legislative pitfalls under the existing Sri Lankan legal domain together with its permeability and restrictions. This study finds that the regulations on claims are not precisely structured and less strong in Sri Lanka. The scope of the definition of ‘claim’ is vague. Only limited types of claims are stated within the legislation and are often wrongly classified. Certain claim types are not defined at all in the Sri Lankan regulations. Therefore, this study suggests that in order to improve public health, future amendments to the existing regulations are necessary with broader, stronger and clear regulations.","PeriodicalId":105560,"journal":{"name":"Ousl Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ousl Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/OUSLJ.V15I2.7484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Claims on labels are one of major marketing strategies in the food industry. Health of consumers may be affected by inaccurate and misleading claims and therefore, such claims need to be regulated by state legislation. The Food (Labelling and Advertising) Regulations, 2005 made under the Food Act of 1980 is the main law governing food labelling claims in Sri Lanka. This study is a desk review which analyses the relevant regulations in the Food (Labelling and Advertising) Regulations, 2005. The study further critiques the existing regulations and compares with international standards (Codex Alimentarius) and regulations in developed countries such as Australia which have a broad local and international food market with modern technology. The objective of the study is to identify the scope of the ‘claim’ and its current legislative pitfalls under the existing Sri Lankan legal domain together with its permeability and restrictions. This study finds that the regulations on claims are not precisely structured and less strong in Sri Lanka. The scope of the definition of ‘claim’ is vague. Only limited types of claims are stated within the legislation and are often wrongly classified. Certain claim types are not defined at all in the Sri Lankan regulations. Therefore, this study suggests that in order to improve public health, future amendments to the existing regulations are necessary with broader, stronger and clear regulations.
斯里兰卡食品标签上的索赔:与选定司法管辖区的比较法律分析
标签上的声明是食品行业的主要营销策略之一。消费者的健康可能会受到不准确和误导性声明的影响,因此,这种声明需要由国家立法加以管制。根据1980年《食品法》制定的2005年《食品(标签和广告)条例》是斯里兰卡管理食品标签声明的主要法律。本研究是一项案头审查,分析了2005年食品(标签和广告)条例中的相关规定。该研究进一步批评了现有法规,并与国际标准(食品法典)和澳大利亚等发达国家的法规进行了比较,这些国家拥有广泛的本地和国际食品市场和现代技术。本研究的目的是确定“索赔”的范围及其在现有斯里兰卡法律领域下的现行立法陷阱及其渗透性和限制。本研究发现,斯里兰卡对索赔的规定结构不精确,力度不够。“权利要求”定义的范围是模糊的。立法中只规定了有限类型的索赔,而且往往被错误地分类。某些索赔类型在斯里兰卡条例中根本没有定义。因此,本研究建议,为了改善公众健康,未来有必要对现有法规进行修订,制定更广泛、更有力和更明确的法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信