{"title":"Narratives of Distinctiveness or Similarity and Connection a Response to Korman, De Jong and Jordan’s Steve De Shazer’s Theory Development","authors":"G. Shennan","doi":"10.59874/001c.74984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020 the Journal of Solution Focused Practices published an article called Steve de Shazer’s Theory Development. This surveyed the whole of de Shazer’s career, which the authors divided into four phases, from which they distilled six axioms they believe are foundational to de Shazer’s thinking and practice. In their commentary on the six axioms there is a considerable emphasis on the distinctiveness of SFBT, which the authors are keen to establish as different, in each of its foundational aspects, from most or perhaps all other therapies. This article is a response to this particular aspect of Steve de Shazer’s Theory Development. It suggests that, in comparing different approaches in the field, it is possible to construct both narratives of distinctiveness and narratives of similarity and connection. Some arguments for developing more narratives of similarity and connection are advanced.","PeriodicalId":137801,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solution Focused Practices","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solution Focused Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59874/001c.74984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 2020 the Journal of Solution Focused Practices published an article called Steve de Shazer’s Theory Development. This surveyed the whole of de Shazer’s career, which the authors divided into four phases, from which they distilled six axioms they believe are foundational to de Shazer’s thinking and practice. In their commentary on the six axioms there is a considerable emphasis on the distinctiveness of SFBT, which the authors are keen to establish as different, in each of its foundational aspects, from most or perhaps all other therapies. This article is a response to this particular aspect of Steve de Shazer’s Theory Development. It suggests that, in comparing different approaches in the field, it is possible to construct both narratives of distinctiveness and narratives of similarity and connection. Some arguments for developing more narratives of similarity and connection are advanced.
2020年,《以解决方案为重点的实践》杂志发表了一篇题为《史蒂夫·德·沙泽的理论发展》的文章。这篇文章调查了德·沙策的整个职业生涯,作者将其分为四个阶段,从中提炼出他们认为是德·沙策思想和实践基础的六个公理。在他们对六个公理的评论中,有相当多的强调SFBT的独特性,作者热衷于在其每个基本方面与大多数或所有其他疗法建立不同。本文是对Steve de Shazer的《理论发展》这一特殊方面的回应。这表明,在比较该领域的不同方法时,有可能构建独特性叙事和相似性和联系叙事。提出了一些关于发展更多相似和联系叙事的论点。