Shuffling across rounds: A lightweight strategy to counter side-channel attacks

Sikhar Patranabis, Debapriya Basu Roy, Praveen Kumar Vadnala, Debdeep Mukhopadhyay, Santosh K. Ghosh
{"title":"Shuffling across rounds: A lightweight strategy to counter side-channel attacks","authors":"Sikhar Patranabis, Debapriya Basu Roy, Praveen Kumar Vadnala, Debdeep Mukhopadhyay, Santosh K. Ghosh","doi":"10.1109/ICCD.2016.7753323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Side-channel attacks are a potent threat to the security of devices implementing cryptographic algorithms. Designing lightweight countermeasures against side-channel analysis that can run on resource constrained devices is a major challenge. One such lightweight countermeasure is shuffling, in which the designer randomly permutes the order of execution of potentially vulnerable operations. State of the art shuffling countermeasures advocate shuffling a set of independent operations in a single round of a cryptographic algorithm, but are often found to be insufficient as standalone countermeasures. In this paper, we propose a two-round version of the shuffling countermeasure, and test its security when applied to a serialized implementation of AES-128 using Test Vector Leakage Assessment (TVLA). Our results show that the required number of traces to break AES-128 implemented using our proposed countermeasure is significantly larger than the implementations using simple one-round shuffling. Furthermore, the new shuffling method has significantly lower overhead of around 1.3 times, as compared to other side-channel countermeasures such as masking that have an overhead of approximately two times.","PeriodicalId":297899,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 34th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 34th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.2016.7753323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Side-channel attacks are a potent threat to the security of devices implementing cryptographic algorithms. Designing lightweight countermeasures against side-channel analysis that can run on resource constrained devices is a major challenge. One such lightweight countermeasure is shuffling, in which the designer randomly permutes the order of execution of potentially vulnerable operations. State of the art shuffling countermeasures advocate shuffling a set of independent operations in a single round of a cryptographic algorithm, but are often found to be insufficient as standalone countermeasures. In this paper, we propose a two-round version of the shuffling countermeasure, and test its security when applied to a serialized implementation of AES-128 using Test Vector Leakage Assessment (TVLA). Our results show that the required number of traces to break AES-128 implemented using our proposed countermeasure is significantly larger than the implementations using simple one-round shuffling. Furthermore, the new shuffling method has significantly lower overhead of around 1.3 times, as compared to other side-channel countermeasures such as masking that have an overhead of approximately two times.
跨回合洗牌:对抗侧通道攻击的轻量级策略
侧信道攻击对实现加密算法的设备的安全性是一个强有力的威胁。在资源受限的设备上设计轻量级的对抗侧信道分析的对策是一个主要的挑战。其中一种轻量级对策是洗牌,即设计者随机排列可能易受攻击的操作的执行顺序。目前的洗牌对策主张在一个密码算法的单轮中洗牌一组独立的操作,但往往发现作为独立的对策是不够的。在本文中,我们提出了一个两轮版本的变换对抗,并使用测试向量泄漏评估(TVLA)测试其应用于AES-128串行实现时的安全性。我们的结果表明,使用我们提出的对策实现的破坏AES-128所需的跟踪数明显大于使用简单的一轮洗牌的实现。此外,与开销约为两倍的其他侧信道对抗(如掩蔽)相比,新洗牌方法的开销显著降低,约为1.3倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信