PELANGGARAN MEREK DAGANG DALAM KASUS PERSAMAAN NAMA MEREK PADA GEPREK BENSU MENURUT UNDANG UNDANG UU NO. 20 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS

Vieri Aspriola Aspriola, Agri Chairunisa Israd
{"title":"PELANGGARAN MEREK DAGANG DALAM KASUS PERSAMAAN NAMA MEREK PADA GEPREK BENSU MENURUT UNDANG UNDANG UU NO. 20 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS","authors":"Vieri Aspriola Aspriola, Agri Chairunisa Israd","doi":"10.59066/jel.v1i3.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowing the legal protection for registered marks and analyzing the Court Decision Number 57 / Pdt.Sus-Merek / 2019 / Pn Niaga Jkt-Pst are the purposes of this research paper. In this research paper uses a case approach with a normative juridical method. Examining library materials is a source of data from normative juridical research. The results showed that there was legal protection for trademark owners who were legally registered. Based on the procedures and laws in force, Geprek Bensu should not be able to be registered because the registration of its trademark copyright was carried out in bad faith. This is because Geprek Bensu has a fundamental and or complete similarity with the I am Geprek Bensu brand and the name of the legal entity PT. Chicken Geprek Benny Sujono. In addition, I Am Geprek Bensu has obtained legal protection for its trademark rights because it has been registered beforehand. This legal protection is obtained because in Indonesia it applies a first to file system.","PeriodicalId":366150,"journal":{"name":"Journal Evidence Of Law","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Evidence Of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v1i3.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Knowing the legal protection for registered marks and analyzing the Court Decision Number 57 / Pdt.Sus-Merek / 2019 / Pn Niaga Jkt-Pst are the purposes of this research paper. In this research paper uses a case approach with a normative juridical method. Examining library materials is a source of data from normative juridical research. The results showed that there was legal protection for trademark owners who were legally registered. Based on the procedures and laws in force, Geprek Bensu should not be able to be registered because the registration of its trademark copyright was carried out in bad faith. This is because Geprek Bensu has a fundamental and or complete similarity with the I am Geprek Bensu brand and the name of the legal entity PT. Chicken Geprek Benny Sujono. In addition, I Am Geprek Bensu has obtained legal protection for its trademark rights because it has been registered beforehand. This legal protection is obtained because in Indonesia it applies a first to file system.
根据第4条,在GEPREK BENSU上,商标侵权案件中违反商标名称。2016年关于品牌和地理标记
了解注册商标的法律保护,分析57 / Pdt号判决书。Sus-Merek / 2019 / Pn Niaga Jkt-Pst是本研究论文的目的。在本研究中,本文采用了案例方法和规范的司法方法。检查图书馆资料是规范性法律研究的数据来源。结果表明,合法注册的商标所有人受到法律保护。根据现行程序和法律,Geprek Bensu不应被注册,因为其商标版权的注册是恶意进行的。这是因为Geprek Bensu与I am Geprek Bensu品牌和法人实体PT. Chicken Geprek Benny Sujono的名称具有基本或完全的相似性。此外,由于I Am Geprek Bensu已事先注册,因此其商标权已获得法律保护。这种法律保护是获得的,因为在印度尼西亚它适用于文件系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信