The Secret to Finding a Match: A Field Experiment on Choice Capacity Design in an Online Dating Platform

Jaehwuen Jung, H. Lim, Dongwon Lee, Chul Kim
{"title":"The Secret to Finding a Match: A Field Experiment on Choice Capacity Design in an Online Dating Platform","authors":"Jaehwuen Jung, H. Lim, Dongwon Lee, Chul Kim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3517018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online matching platforms require new approaches to market design because firms can now control many aspects of the search and interaction process through various IT-enabled features. Although choice capacity—the number of candidates a user can view and select—is a key design feature of online matching platforms, its effect on engagement and matching outcomes remains unclear. We examine the effect of different choice capacities on market performance by conducting a randomized field experiment in collaboration with an online dating platform. Specifically, we design four treatment groups with different choice capacities in which users can only interact with other users in the same group and randomly assign the users to the treatment groups. We find that providing more choice capacity to male and female users has different effects on choice behaviors and matching outcomes. Although increasing the choice capacity of male users yields the highest engagement, increasing the choice capacity of female users is the most effective method to increase matching outcomes. We empirically demonstrate four mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of different choice capacity designs and generalize our findings by discussing how choice capacity can be designed to increase engagement and matching outcomes.","PeriodicalId":370988,"journal":{"name":"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3517018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Online matching platforms require new approaches to market design because firms can now control many aspects of the search and interaction process through various IT-enabled features. Although choice capacity—the number of candidates a user can view and select—is a key design feature of online matching platforms, its effect on engagement and matching outcomes remains unclear. We examine the effect of different choice capacities on market performance by conducting a randomized field experiment in collaboration with an online dating platform. Specifically, we design four treatment groups with different choice capacities in which users can only interact with other users in the same group and randomly assign the users to the treatment groups. We find that providing more choice capacity to male and female users has different effects on choice behaviors and matching outcomes. Although increasing the choice capacity of male users yields the highest engagement, increasing the choice capacity of female users is the most effective method to increase matching outcomes. We empirically demonstrate four mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of different choice capacity designs and generalize our findings by discussing how choice capacity can be designed to increase engagement and matching outcomes.
寻找匹配的秘密:在线约会平台选择容量设计的现场实验
在线匹配平台需要新的市场设计方法,因为公司现在可以通过各种it功能控制搜索和交互过程的许多方面。尽管选择能力——用户可以查看和选择的候选人数量——是在线匹配平台的一个关键设计特征,但它对参与和匹配结果的影响尚不清楚。我们通过与在线约会平台合作进行随机现场实验,研究了不同选择能力对市场绩效的影响。具体而言,我们设计了四个具有不同选择能力的处理组,其中用户只能与同一组中的其他用户进行交互,并随机将用户分配到处理组。我们发现,为男性和女性用户提供更多的选择能力对选择行为和匹配结果有不同的影响。虽然增加男性用户的选择能力会产生最高的参与度,但增加女性用户的选择能力是增加匹配结果的最有效方法。我们通过经验证明了不同选择能力设计的有效性背后的四种机制,并通过讨论如何设计选择能力来提高参与度和匹配结果来概括我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信