The Impact of Contingency Factors on the Balanced Scorecard Adoption: Evidence from Algeria

Mehdi Bouchetara, Sarah Amrani, Messaoud Zerouti, Sidi Mohammed Bouchenak Khelladi, Nabil Mehddeb
{"title":"The Impact of Contingency Factors on the Balanced Scorecard Adoption: Evidence from Algeria","authors":"Mehdi Bouchetara, Sarah Amrani, Messaoud Zerouti, Sidi Mohammed Bouchenak Khelladi, Nabil Mehddeb","doi":"10.21272/bel.5(4).32-47.2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to analyse the existence of significant relationships between some contingency factors and the degree of adoption of the balanced scorecard. A quantitative study, based on a survey, is conducted among 186 individuals, belonging to different Algerian enterprises, from different sectors. Only 57 responses were obtained, that 43 were complete and usable. Otherwise, we obtained a response rate of 23.12%. The results indicate that only three contingency factors (age, differentiation strategy and competition intensity) are found to be significantly associated with the degree of use of the balanced scorecard indicators. Thus, we conclude that the adoption of the balanced scorecard increases with the rivalry of firms in the markets, with the degree of diversity of their products/services and that older and more mature firm are more likely to use this tool. Despite this study’s limitations, the main findings have potential implications for future research, particularly for researchers wishing to test the diversity in the use of the balanced scorecard across different industries and to explore its advantages and disadvantages. Our model is limited by its exclusion of the effects of other important contingency factors, such as organisational culture, corporate social responsibility, industry, computerisation and others. However, limiting ourselves to a one country allows us to control for the effects of local management practices. We provide evidence of associations rather than drawing conclusions about causality. Another limitation is due to the low representativeness of the sample which may generate a risk of bias.","PeriodicalId":410560,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics and Leadership","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics and Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.5(4).32-47.2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to analyse the existence of significant relationships between some contingency factors and the degree of adoption of the balanced scorecard. A quantitative study, based on a survey, is conducted among 186 individuals, belonging to different Algerian enterprises, from different sectors. Only 57 responses were obtained, that 43 were complete and usable. Otherwise, we obtained a response rate of 23.12%. The results indicate that only three contingency factors (age, differentiation strategy and competition intensity) are found to be significantly associated with the degree of use of the balanced scorecard indicators. Thus, we conclude that the adoption of the balanced scorecard increases with the rivalry of firms in the markets, with the degree of diversity of their products/services and that older and more mature firm are more likely to use this tool. Despite this study’s limitations, the main findings have potential implications for future research, particularly for researchers wishing to test the diversity in the use of the balanced scorecard across different industries and to explore its advantages and disadvantages. Our model is limited by its exclusion of the effects of other important contingency factors, such as organisational culture, corporate social responsibility, industry, computerisation and others. However, limiting ourselves to a one country allows us to control for the effects of local management practices. We provide evidence of associations rather than drawing conclusions about causality. Another limitation is due to the low representativeness of the sample which may generate a risk of bias.
权变因素对平衡计分卡采用的影响:来自阿尔及利亚的证据
本文旨在分析某些权变因素与平衡计分卡采用程度之间是否存在显著关系。在一项调查的基础上,对来自不同部门的不同阿尔及利亚企业的186名个人进行了定量研究。只收到57份答复,其中43份是完整和可用的。除此之外,我们得到的回复率为23.12%。结果表明,只有三个偶然性因素(年龄、差异化战略和竞争强度)与平衡计分卡指标的使用程度显著相关。因此,我们得出结论,平衡计分卡的采用随着公司在市场上的竞争以及其产品/服务的多样性程度的增加而增加,并且较老和较成熟的公司更有可能使用该工具。尽管本研究存在局限性,但主要研究结果对未来的研究具有潜在的意义,特别是对于希望测试不同行业平衡计分卡使用多样性并探索其优缺点的研究人员。我们的模型的局限性在于它排除了其他重要的偶然性因素的影响,如组织文化、企业社会责任、行业、计算机化和其他因素。然而,把我们自己限制在一个国家使我们能够控制当地管理做法的影响。我们提供关联的证据,而不是得出因果关系的结论。另一个限制是由于样本的代表性较低,这可能会产生偏倚的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信